Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.culture.alaska    |    People's weird obsession with Alaska    |    51,804 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 49,961 of 51,804    |
|    Rudolph P. Kohltrane to All    |
|    One in five liberal democrat communists     |
|    11 Feb 21 13:09:45    |
      XPost: alt.gossip.celebrities, alt.politics.democrats.d, sac.general       XPost: alt.rush-limbaugh       From: suckers@21stcenturydems.org              Liberals are not Americans.              One consequence of the success of the National Rifle       Association's expansive gun-rights agenda — and its lobbying       power in Congress — is that groups favoring more gun control       have pared down their ambitions in recent years.              The Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, for instance, no       longer talks about banning handguns. Advocates have moved away       from the term “gun control” in favor of more specific language       like “gun violence” and “gun safety.” Democratic leaders in       Congress have grown timid about proposing significant new       restrictions on gun ownership.              In that context it's a bit of a jolt to read an op-ed published       Tuesday by retired Supreme Court justice John Paul Stevens       titled “Repeal the Second Amendment.” Stevens is something of an       expert on the issue, having considered the proper scope of the       Second Amendment in the 2008 case District of Columbia v. Heller.              In his op-ed, Stevens praises the work of the March for Our       Lives organizers and urges the group to “seek more effective and       more lasting reform” via a “repeal of the Second Amendment.” He       calls the Second Amendment a “relic of the 18th century,”       concerned more with the balance of power between the states and       the federal government than with individual gun rights.              But public-opinion polling shows that it would take a lot of       persuading to bring the public around to that view. In February,       for instance, the Economist and YouGov asked Americans whether       they supported a repeal of the Second Amendment. Twenty-one       percent said they favored such a proposal, compared with 60       percent in opposition.                     The poll does, however, show surprisingly robust support for       Second Amendment repeal (39 percent) among Democrats (by       contrast, 8 percent of Republicans would support a full repeal).       Black Americans (30 percent) and Northeasterners (28 percent)       also showed relatively high levels of support.              One caveat is that other polls have shown that many Americans do       not know what the Second Amendment is. In 1999, for instance, a       Hearst Newspapers poll found that 59 percent of respondents said       they did not know the purpose of the Second Amendment. But       national conversations on gun rights since then have probably       shrunk that number, and the Economist/YouGov poll discusses the       Second Amendment in the context of guns.              Beyond that, the poll showed that a plurality of Americans do       not see the Second Amendment as something set in stone. Forty-       six percent said they favored modifying the Second Amendment to       allow for stricter regulations, compared with 39 percent who       were opposed. More than three-quarters of Democrats said they       supported modifying the Second Amendment, as did more than one-       quarter of Republicans.                     Those numbers are surprising, given that virtually no political       leaders in the country are publicly advocating for a repeal or       modification of the Second Amendment. Democrat Hillary Clinton       made gun control a focal point of her presidential bid but spoke       of the need to “balance legitimate Second Amendment-rights       concerns with preventive measures and control measures.” In       2016, President Barack Obama felt compelled to publicly state       that “I believe in the Second Amendment” as he announced a set       of extremely limited executive actions on guns.              Even Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), who has for years been a       leading proponent of gun control in the Senate, wrote in 2012,       “let me be clear: If an individual wants to purchase a weapon       for hunting or self-defense, I support that right.”              But the polling above suggests that a significant chunk of the       Democratic electorate would be willing to support a much more       restrictive gun-policy agenda than the party currently supports.       The coming of age of the “mass shooting generation” may increase       that divide.              https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2018/03/27/one-in-       five-americans-want-the-second-amendment-to-be-repealed-national-       survey-finds/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.3e88a0fc9ba6                      --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca