Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.culture.alaska    |    People's weird obsession with Alaska    |    51,804 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 50,013 of 51,804    |
|    Gone Fishin' to All    |
|    Moonbat Debbie Dingell Shows She Thinks     |
|    15 Feb 21 10:25:06    |
      XPost: alt.gossip.celebrities, alt.politics.democrats.d, sac.general       XPost: alt.rush-limbaugh       From: democrat-traitors@house.gov              It is totally unprecedented in American history.              The House of Representatives has voted Articles of Impeachment       against President Trump and then refused to do anything else.       Nothing. In a way the use of the US Constitution as a prop to       try to gain transitory electoral advantage is pretty much a page       out of the American left’s playbook.                     David Burge       @iowahawkblog       1. Target a respected institution       2. Kill & clean it       3. Wear it as a skin suit, while demanding respect              122       5:46 AM - May 25, 2016       Twitter Ads info and privacy       76 people are talking about this              Why she’s mewling about a fair trial an other obvious bullsh**,       what Pelosi is really dealing with is trying to de-stick herself       from this tarbaby. No matter how popular impeachment is at The       Bulwark and The Dispatch and San Francisco, the issue is a total       dog in key states the Democrats must win in order to defeat       Donald Trump. The charges against him are certifiably bizarre.       The way the impeachment inquiry was conducted would have made       Roland Freisler green with envy. If the charges are summarily       dismissed…or worse yet, the House “impeachment managers” are       forced to present the dog’s breakfast of a case to the American       people in the face of an actual defense, the Democrats are going       to suffer significant political damage.              Pelosi’s only way out of this is to try to convince the public       that her interjecting herself into the affairs of the Senate is       appropriate, and, failing that, that there is nothing unusual       about Pelosi holding onto the Articles of Impeachment.              This is where Michigan Democrat Debbie Dingell comes in. If       you’ve never heard of her before this week,there is a good       reason. She’s a mediocrity who won an House seat because her       husband, dead Democrat John Dingell, was able to see to her       succeeding him when he had to retire.              She was on Fox News Sunday, telling a huge lie and trying to       gaslight you into believing that there is absolutely nothing       amiss with the House Speaker sitting on Articles of Impeachment.              Chris Wallace: All right. Why is Speaker Pelosi delaying in       sending the articles of impeachment over to the Senate and how       long is she willing and prepared to wait?              Debbie Dingell: So, I don’t know what the timeframe will be, but       I would like to remind people that when President Clinton was       impeached, he was impeached on December 19th and the managers       were not appointed until January 6th. The Congress doesn’t       return until January 6th and was kind of referred to by Marc       Short earlier. There were two resolutions at that time. One was       a resolution to proceed that was passed by 100 to 0 and then       there was a second resolution about who the witnesses would be.              This is a lie. The House passed Articles of Impeachment by about       noon on Saturday, December 19, 1998. By 3 p.m. that same day the       House had appointed impeachment managers and forwarded the       Articles of Impeachment to the Senate. This is from CNN on       Saturday, December 19, 1998:              WASHINGTON (AllPolitics, December 19) — A deeply divided House       of Representatives impeached President Bill Clinton Saturday on       charges of lying under oath to a federal grand jury and       obstructing justice in the Monica Lewinsky affair. The two       allegations of “high crimes and misdemeanors” next go to the       Senate for trial.              Enough Republicans broke ranks to defeat the two other articles       of impeachment recommended one week ago by the House Judiciary       Committee. Those accused Clinton of committing perjury in his       deposition in the Paula Jones case and abusing his power in his       efforts to cover up his sexual relationship with Lewinsky, a       former White House intern.              Committee Chairman Henry Hyde, who will prosecute the case in       the Senate, delivered the impeachment articles to the Secretary       of the Senate at 3 p.m. ET. The trial is expected to get       underway in mid-January after the 106th Congress takes office.              There was a subsequent reappointment of impeachment managers as       a new House was sworn in before the Senate took up the trial and       the resolution passed by the previous House had expired with it.       That is not the case here.              Here’s the thing. Dingell either knew she lied on television or       she’s a moron. I’m open to either scenario but I tend to believe       she’s just a liar. Chris Wallace just let the lie go. I say let       it go because there is nothing in his history that leads me to              [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca