Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.culture.alaska    |    People's weird obsession with Alaska    |    51,804 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 50,075 of 51,804    |
|    Fuck diversity to All    |
|    In 2016, the Ghostbusters reboot didn’t     |
|    21 Feb 21 00:10:10    |
      XPost: alt.gossip.celebrities, alt.politics.democrats.d, sac.general       XPost: alt.rush-limbaugh       From: bankrupt@disney.com              Fuck diversity. Some things should never be changed.              By Alissa Wilkinson               @alissamarie        alissa@vox.com              None of the Ghostbusters movies are particularly good, though       you might argue the original was great, in the way that cult       comedy classics from the 1980s often take on a life of their own       with people who grew up wearing out their VHS copies or       rewatching them on TV whenever they aired. But without the       nostalgia factor in play, each successive Ghostbusters film or       property, at best, feels like a funny idea for a sketch       stretched out to feature-length, then buoyed by its performers’       name recognition and irresistible comic performances and,       eventually, nostalgia.              That’s one reason why the mid-decade announcement of a new       “gender-swapped” version of Ghostbusters — which, like the 1984       original, would star four Saturday Night Live performers (three       former cast members and one multi-repeat host), but this time       they’d be women — was met with skepticism. Was there really       enough life in Ghostbusters to sustain a whole new reboot?              That skepticism, a familiar response to most announcements of       reboots and remakes, was justifiable; one clear trend of the       2010s was the never-ending resurrection of pop culture       properties we thought were long over, mostly with no good reason       beyond “nostalgia sells.” But more generalized skepticism over       the idea of an all-woman Ghostbusters was quickly eclipsed by a       bizarrely overblown backlash, months before the film even came       out.              In the end, the movie was merely fine. But in retrospect, the       Great Ghostbusters Apocalypse of spring 2016 was a harbinger of       things to come, and a window into the ways the internet can fan       the flames and provide a platform for the toxic corners of pop       culture fandoms to act on their worst impulses.              The attacks on Ghostbusters and subsequent movies set a template       for a different, degraded kind of criticism       In some ways, the Ghostbusters backlash was a sequel to       Gamergate, which began with the bizarre and misogynistic       harassment of a number of women in the gaming world, grew into a       full-blown online troll onslaught, and eventually became a       blueprint for recruiting mostly young men to the burgeoning alt-       right. The Ghostbusters backlash was also perpetuated largely by       a violently vocal minority and took some of the same shape as       Gamergate, particularly in the ways it targeted women and people       of color.              The casting of the film’s four stars — Kristen Wiig, Melissa       McCarthy, Kate McKinnon, and Leslie Jones — was declared to be a       “SJW” capitulation to “political correctness,” and Jones, the       only woman of color in the cast, became the target of a       particularly hateful online assault led by self-styled       provocateur Milo Yiannopoulos (who was eventually banned from       Twitter as a result). Yiannopoulos’s campaign against Jones       ultimately reached the point where it became part of the 2016       election cycle and a flashpoint in the alt-right’s culture war.              And that was part of the point; as one Twitter user who spent       months relentlessly attacking the Ghostbusters filmmakers and       cast proclaimed, “Ghostbusters 2016 is a declaration of a       culture war.”              RELATED              How the all-female Ghostbusters reboot became a lightning rod of       controversy       The vicious threats and blatantly racist attacks were clearly       the product of the worst parts of Ghostbusters’ so-called       “fandom.” The same tactics would be repeated in later assaults       on other movies deemed too “political” by the alt-right, which       was a not-so-coded way of saying movies that featured women and       people of color in lead roles in franchise films they considered       to belong to the “true” fans, rather than the films’ creators:       Black Panther, Captain Marvel, Star Wars: The Last Jedi, and       more. In most cases, the attacks usually happened before anyone       had seen the films, prompting review aggregation websites like       Rotten Tomatoes to update their policies around audience scores       to prevent trolls from artificially deflating scores before a       movie’s release date.              The harm also extended beyond attacks on specific people       associated with the movies, by making it nearly impossible to       have a conversation about Ghostbusters — or Captain Marvel or       The Last Jedi or any other similarly targeted property — that       was actually about the movies. Instead of talking about the              [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca