Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.culture.alaska    |    People's weird obsession with Alaska    |    51,804 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 50,848 of 51,804    |
|    Progressive Liberalism to All    |
|    Why is San Francisco ... covered in huma    |
|    24 Apr 21 22:17:46    |
      XPost: alt.gossip.celebrities, alt.politics.democrats.d, sac.general       XPost: alt.rush-limbaugh       From: lets-poop-together@abc.com              t’s an empirical fact: San Francisco is a crappier place to live       these days. Sightings of human feces on the sidewalks are now a       regular occurrence; over the past 10 years, complaints about       human waste have increased 400%. People now call the city 65       times a day to report poop, and there have been 14,597 calls in       2018 alone. Last year, software engineer Jenn Wong even created       a poop map of San Francisco, showing the concentration of       incidents across the city. New mayor London Breed said: “There       is more feces on the sidewalks than I’ve ever seen growing up       here.” In a revolting recent incident, a 20lb bag of fecal waste       showed up on a street in the city’s Tenderloin district.               Gentrification's toll: 'It's you or the bottom line and sorry,       it's not you'       Rebecca Solnit        Read more       A city covered in poop is so disgusting it has to be almost       comical. But the uptick in street defecation is the symbol of a       human tragedy. People aren’t pooping on the streets because they       have suddenly forgotten what a bathroom is, or unlearned basic       hygiene. The incidents are part of a broader failure of the city       to provide for the basic needs of its citizens, and show the       catastrophic, socially destructive effects of unchecked       inequality.              It’s impossible to talk about street feces without talking about       homelessness and housing. While there aren’t actually more       homeless people than there have been in the past, the       gentrification of San Francisco has had a severe effect on the       homeless. Development has pushed homeless residents out of       secluded spaces, and there is less and less space for them to       inhabit as “places where homeless people used to sleep becoming       offices and housing”, in the words of a city official. The city       routinely clears away encampments, causing people to wander       around the city in search of a new temporary space.              Poop on the streets has another obvious cause: a lack of       restroom access. Many businesses restrict their bathrooms to       customers only, precisely because they don’t want their       facilities to be frequented by the homeless. But the       “privatization of bathrooms” means people are left without       obvious places to go. There are even websites offering tips on       how to go to the bathroom in San Francisco, such as by       pretending to be interested in furniture at Crate & Barrel or       finding the “hidden gem” of a bathroom on the second floor of a       Banana Republic. The city has installed 25 small self-cleaning       public toilets and recently commissioned a set of futuristic-       looking new bathrooms, but a few dozen toilets for a city of       870,000 is woefully insufficient. Bathroom access should be       considered a basic right, and it’s worth considering the idea of       banning “customers only” toilets. In a city with generous public       spaces and a commitment to equal access, no one would ever have       to use the street.               In a city with generous public spaces and a commitment to equal       access, no one? would ever have to use the street       But bathrooms are only part of the problem. Housing itself is       just as much a contributor. San Francisco spends hundreds of       millions of dollars a year on anti-homelessness initiatives, but       it has only managed to keep the number of homeless people from       growing further. There are still 7,500 homeless residents who       have no chance of finding accommodation in a city where a studio       apartment costs $2,500 a month. This kind of inequality demands       a radical solution. For all the talk about encouraging       developers to build affordable housing, a better plan may simply       be to have the city build housing itself. As Peter Gowan and       Ryan Cooper put it in a report for the People’s Policy Project,       “social housing” has gotten a bad reputation over the years, but       partly because it has never been invested in properly. Gowan and       Cooper say the solution is simpler than it looks: cities with       housing crises need to simply build houses.              A broader problem, though, is the lack of interest that many San       Franciscans seem to have in improving the lives of the homeless.       Many seem to view this population as a simple inconvenience,       such as the tech bro who complained to the mayor about having to       see “homeless riff-raff” or the rich woman who took out a full-       page ad in the San Francisco Chronicle to report having seen a       homeless man with a pair of scissors.               To close America's diet gap, we must recognize food as a human       right       Sinikka Elliott, Sarah Bowen and Joslyn Brenton        Read more       There is a self-interested reason why such people should want to       do something about homelessness. No doubt city officials were       spooked last month when a major medical convention was canceled       due to organizers’ fears of the homeless. But there are       “solutions” that simply put the problem out of mind – like       Michael Bloomberg’s proposal to give every homeless person a one-       way bus ticket out of the city. And there are those which will       actually mitigate the effects of inequality. These will cost       much more, and demand some self-sacrifice from the city’s uber-       wealthy.              San Francisco has begun to take measures to address the problem       of street defecation. The city has launched a “Poop Patrol” to       make sure the sidewalks are kept clean of waste. But the problem       is a systemic one, and is the predictable consequence of being       one of the least affordable cities in the country. It’s what       happens when desperate people have no place to go.              Nathan Robinson is the editor of Current Affairs              https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/aug/18/san-       francisco-poop-problem-inequality-homelessness                      --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca