Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.culture.alaska    |    People's weird obsession with Alaska    |    51,804 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 51,002 of 51,804    |
|    Deplorable Redneck to All    |
|    The Trump administration's proposed home    |
|    21 May 21 00:50:42    |
      XPost: alt.gossip.celebrities, alt.politics.democrats.d, sac.general       XPost: alt.rush-limbaugh       From: deplorable.redneck@nytimes.com              I'm perfectly fine with that. Fuck off, Vox.              A proposed Housing and Urban Development rule would allow       federally funded homeless shelters to judge a person’s physical       characteristics, such as height and facial hair, in determining       whether they belong in a women’s or men’s shelter, according to       a copy of the rule’s text obtained by Vox. Advocates say this       ultimately targets both trans women and cisgender women with       masculine features, which could force them into men’s shelters       and put them at risk for harm.              The proposed rule, first announced by HUD in a press release       issued on July 1, would essentially reverse the Obama-era rule       that required homeless shelters to house trans people according       to their gender identity. While the new rule would bar shelters       from excluding people based on their transgender status, it       would also allow shelters to ignore a person’s gender identity —       and instead house them according to their assigned sex at birth       or their legal sex. In other words, a trans woman can’t be       turned away from a shelter for being trans, but she can be       forced to go to a men’s shelter.              Dylan Waguespack, a spokesperson for True Colors United, an       advocacy group that focuses on supporting LGBTQ homeless youth,       told Vox in early June that HUD Secretary Ben Carson is “talking       out of both sides of his mouth.”              “They are trying to put forward this narrative in which       transgender people are protected from discrimination, but in       fact, when you read the proposal itself, it does the exact       opposite,” he told Vox. “It creates unsafe conditions and unsafe       barriers to housing and services for trans people in the midst       of a global pandemic.”              The copy of the rule obtained by Vox has already passed       congressional review, according to several sources familiar with       the process, which is one of many steps needed before the text       is released publicly. When asked about the text and status of       the rule, HUD pointed Vox to their July 1 press release.              The rule’s language, according to the leaked text, states that       single-sex shelter staff “may determine an individual’s sex       based on a good faith belief that an individual seeking access       to the temporary, emergency shelters is not of the sex, as       defined in the single-sex facility’s policy, which the facility       accommodates.”              In order to do this, HUD will allow shelter staff to take into       account “factors such as height, the presence (but not the       absence) of facial hair, the presence of an Adam’s apple, and       other physical characteristics which, when considered together,       are indicative of a person’s biological sex.”              In essence, the proposed rule encourages women’s-only shelter       staff to use a visual appraisal of a woman’s appearance to judge       whether that person is woman enough to use the facility.              If a shelter operator judges a homeless woman’s appearance to       not fit what they believe is her assigned sex at birth, they       would then be allowed to ask for proof of that person’s sex       before housing her in the women’s facility.              “Evidence requested must not be unduly intrusive of privacy,       such as private physical anatomical evidence. Evidence requested       could include government identification, but lack of government       identification alone cannot be the sole basis for denying       admittance on the basis of sex,” reads the rule’s text, as it       currently stands.              There are two main problems with forcing trans homeless people       into spaces that correspond with their birth-assigned gender       rather than their gender identity. The first is that such a       policy exposes trans people, especially trans women, to       potential violence and sexual assault inside those spaces. And       as a result, trans people are more likely to choose sleeping in       the streets rather than risk going to a shelter.              Because of a cycle of discrimination and poverty, trans people       are more likely than their cisgender peers to experience       homelessness. According to the National Center for Transgender       Equality, 29 percent of trans people live in poverty, and one in       five trans people in the US will be homeless at some point in              [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca