Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.culture.alaska    |    People's weird obsession with Alaska    |    51,804 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 51,091 of 51,804    |
|    AlleyCat to All    |
|    Trump's Own Lawyers Kept Refuting His Vo    |
|    25 May 21 19:58:42    |
      XPost: alt.gossip.celebrities, alt.politics.democrats.d, sac.general       XPost: alt.rush-limbaugh, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh       From: AlleyCat@ymail.com              Trump’s own lawyers keep undermining his voter fraud claims                     President Trump’s legal challenges are still floundering, as lawyers are       forced to wage a battle based on specious and baseless claims in an effort to       hold up the certification of the 2020 election.              But what’s often just as notable as the failure of the efforts is in how       little they resemble Trump’s actual allegations.              In fact, despite Trump’s claims of massive fraud and other nefarious       occurrences, his lawyers have repeatedly acknowledged that there is no       evidence of such things or said they weren’t making the same allegations       Trump is.              They have also undermined Trump’s claims when it comes to whether observers       were allowed to witness vote-counting, so-called glitches in voting machines       and the idea that dead people voted.              Below is a comparison between what Trump has said and what his lawyers have       said about the same subjects.       Massive fraud              What Trump says: “I WON THE ELECTION. VOTER FRAUD ALL OVER THE COUNTRY!”       (Nov. 18)       AD              “ … There were massive improprieties and fraud … ” (Nov. 17)              What his lawyers say: Appearing in a Pennsylvania courtroom Tuesday in the       state’s biggest case, Trump lawyer Rudolph W. Giuliani conceded, “This is not       a fraud case.”              In the same case, a judge asked Trump lawyer Linda Kerns whether she would       “agree with me that you are not proceeding based on allegations of fraud or       misconduct; is that correct?” Kerns responded, “I am not proceeding on those       allegations."              In Montgomery County, Pa., Trump lawyer Jonathan S. Goldstein was asked by a       judge, “Are you claiming that there is any fraud in connection with these 592       disputed ballots?” Goldstein responded: “To my knowledge at present, no.”              In Maricopa County, Ariz., home to Phoenix, Trump lawyer Kory Langhofer said,       “We are not alleging fraud in this lawsuit. … This is not about fraud.”       AD              And in a joint stipulation signed by the Trump campaign’s lawyers this week       in Bucks County, Pa., they acknowledged that they had no evidence of fraud:               27. Petitioners do not allege, and there is no evidence of, any fraud in       connection with the challenged ballots.        28. Petitioners do not allege, and there is no evidence of, any       misconduct in connection with the challenged ballots.        29. Petitioners do not allege, and there is no evidence of, any       impropriety in connection with the challenged ballots.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca