Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.culture.alaska    |    People's weird obsession with Alaska    |    51,804 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 51,163 of 51,804    |
|    Jane Fonda Socialist Report to All    |
|    Former Staffer Admits SPLC Is a Money-ma    |
|    30 May 21 22:45:09    |
      XPost: alt.gossip.celebrities, alt.politics.democrats.d, sac.general       XPost: alt.rush-limbaugh       From: jane.fonda.socialist.report@cnn.com              The Southern Poverty Law Center was long ago exposed as money-       making scam.              It has amassed almost half-a-billion dollars fighting an       imaginary tide of “hate” that is ever “rising,” which provides       the twin benefits of bringing in that money and advancing the       totalitarian goals of the radical Left. Topping that agenda is       demonizing any opposition to the Left as “hate,” be it racism,       homophobia, transphobia, and Islamophobia.              But last week, the discredited group fired its co-founder,       Morris Dees, a shocker in the “civil rights community” that       opened the door to discussing exactly who Dees is and what goes       on at SPLC, also called the Poverty Palace.              Former SPLC staff member Bob Moser took to the New Yorker       yesterday to elaborate on what we’ve known for some time: The       SPLC is, again, a money-making scam. But he revealed that truth       from the inside.              Until Justice Rolls Down Like Dollars       A detailed report in the Los Angeles Times explained that SPLC       fired Dees likely because of the long-term abuse of women and       blacks at the organization.              Stephen Bright, a Yale law professor and former director of the       Southern Center for Human Rights in Atlanta, told the Times that       SPLC’s fundraising is “fraudulent,” and called Dees a “flimflam       man and he’s managed to flimflam his way along for many years       raising money by telling people about the Ku Klux Klan and hate       groups,” he said. “He sort of goes to whatever will sell and       has, of course, brought in millions and millions and millions of       dollars.”              The flim-flam man’s career is officially over, and Moser offers       a few insights that open with an amusing but telling vignette:              I’ve been thinking about the jokes my S.P.L.C. colleagues and I       used to tell to keep ourselves sane. Walking to lunch past the       center’s Maya Lin-designed memorial to civil-rights martyrs,       we’d cast a glance at the inscription from Martin Luther King,       Jr., etched into the black marble — “Until justice rolls down       like waters”— and intone, in our deepest voices, “Until justice       rolls down like dollars.” The Law Center had a way of turning       idealists into cynics.              Working in a building that “made social justice ‘look       despotic,’” the earnest young leftist quickly learned that       fighting hate involved a lot of hypocrisy and a lot more money.              Of the hypocrisy, Moser wrote, blacks at SPLC were almost       uniformly “administrative and support staff — ‘the help,’ one of       my black colleagues said pointedly.” But the “‘professional       staff’ — the lawyers, researchers, educators, public-relations       officers, and fund-raisers — were almost exclusively white. Just       two staffers, including me, were openly gay.”              Of the money-making, Moser quotes another of Dees’s critics, who       says Dees viewed “civil-rights work mainly as a marketing tool       for bilking gullible Northern liberals.”              So beyond Dees’s having a “reputation for hitting on young       women,” SPLC is just a storefront for selling the “fight against       hate” to make a pile of money. “The work could be meaningful and       gratifying,” Moser wrote. “But it was hard, for many of us, not       to feel like we’d become pawns in what was, in many respects, a       highly profitable scam.”              SPLC, a former staff member said to Moser, was a “virtual buffet       of injustices.”              Moser eventually admits that he and other staffers didn’t care       enough about their own integrity to blow the whistle:              Outside of work, we spent a lot of time drinking and dishing in       Montgomery bars and restaurants about the oppressive security       regime, the hyperbolic fund-raising appeals, and the fact that,       though the center claimed to be effective in fighting extremism,       “hate” always continued to be on the rise, more dangerous than       ever, with each year’s report on hate groups. “The S.P.L.C.—       making hate pay,” we’d say.              It wasn’t funny then. At this moment, it seems even grimmer.              But Moser and this coworkers participated in the “making hate       pay.”              No Objections at All to What SPLC Did       Not once in this half-apology for joining this massive fraud did       Moser express sorrow for helping smear innocent conservatives.              Aside from defaming mainstream conservatives, SPLC’s application       of the “hate group” label inspired an attempted mass murder at       the Family Research Council.              But Moser’s concern was this: “As critics have long pointed out,       however, the hate-group designations also drive attention to the       extremists. Many groups, including the religious-right Family       Research Council and the Alliance Defending Freedom, raise              [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca