Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.culture.alaska    |    People's weird obsession with Alaska    |    51,804 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 51,296 of 51,804    |
|    Bradley K. Sherman to All    |
|    2020 - Democrats vote two pedophiles int    |
|    28 Aug 21 09:53:14    |
      XPost: alt.fan.sean-hannity, talk.politics.misc, alt.politics.democrats       From: bksherman@bleeding-rectums.cnn.com              Pedo Biden.              Pedo protector Kamala.              Column: California needs to take another look at its Catholic       Church sexual abuse cases              California Atty. Gen. Xavier Becerra has gained a reputation for       going after anyone or anything that he feels threatens our       Golden State. He’s filed 35 lawsuits just against the Trump       administration. He’s prosecuted landlords who gouged renters       after the devastating Tubbs fire last year. He has stood with       “Dreamers” and against gun manufacturers.              So far, however, Becerra’s office has stayed mum on one of       California’s biggest criminal outrages: sex abuse in the       Catholic Church.              This decades-long scandal flared up again last month with the       release of a Pennsylvania grand jury report. It detailed how 300       priests molested at least 1,000 children and groomed them for       abuse over the last 70 years. But the equally horrific crime,       Pennsylvania Atty. Gen. Josh Shapiro correctly argued, was that       church hierarchy and law enforcement officials largely ignored       victims and let offenders continue their depravities.              That was the case in California, too. Many of the still-alive       monsignors, bishops and cardinals involved in California’s part       of the pedophile priest problem have never faced appropriate       consequences for their inaction. In New Jersey and New York, the       attorneys general have launched new investigations. Becerra       should do the same here.              I’ve covered the scandal in the Diocese of Orange since 2003,       and even then it was evident to me that this wasn’t just a       problem of a few bad padres.              The cover-up involved political players. In 1981, a Benicia       police officer found Jerome Henson, a Dominican priest, with a       13-year-old boy’s legs around his shoulders late at night.       Officials with the Diocese of Sacramento transferred Henson       within days to the Diocese of Reno, then to the Orange diocese.       There, Henson worked under Tom Fuentes in the communications       office, where the two helped to keep parishioners unaware of the       predators within their pews. Fuentes went on to become the       architect of the modern-day Republican Party in Orange County.              Many of the still-alive monsignors, bishops and cardinals       involved in California’s part of the pedophile priest problem       have never faced prosecution.              The cover-up involved police. In 1984, Oliver O’Grady, an Irish       priest working in Stockton, admitted to local detectives that he       had molested children. But when lieutenants of Roger Mahony, who       was then bishop of the Diocese of Stockton, promised to put       O’Grady into therapy and keep him away from children, the       detectives halted their investigation. O’Grady went on to       assault dozens of children across the Central Valley before he       was finally convicted in 1993. By then, Mahony was a cardinal       for the Archdiocese of Los Angeles, where he presided over more       pedophile priests.              The cover-up involved district attorneys. In 1975, church       officials in Orange County told prosecutors that Eleuterio Ramos       had molested a boy; the district attorney’s office suggested       psychological care instead of prison. Ramos became the most       prolific pedophile priest in Orange County history, admitting to       a victim last decade that he assaulted at least 25 boys.              Our sainted Sen. Kamala Harris, who trumpets her prosecution of       Backpage.com as evidence that she’s tough on sex crimes, is also       among those tarred in my mind. In 2005, while she was San       Francisco’s district attorney, Harris rebuffed a public-records       request by SF Weekly to release personnel files from the       Archdiocese of San Francisco. (Her predecessor had planned to       make them public after prosecuting criminal priests, but the       California Supreme Court stopped those cases when it declared       unconstitutional a 2002 law that lifted the criminal statute of       limitations.) Similar archives in Boston had exposed the scope       of the scandal there. “We’re not interested in selling out our       victims to look good in the paper,” Harris told SF Weekly in a       statement — this, even though many of those victims pleaded with       her to release the documents.              And she never prosecuted any pedophile priest.              Even Gov. Jerry Brown sinned. He twice vetoed bills that would       have extended the statute of limitations for victims to bring              [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca