XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump, alt.politics.libertarian   
   XPost: alt.los-angeles, talk.politics.guns   
   From: bill.clinton@epstein.island   
      
   On 04 Jan 2024, Michael A Terrell  posted   
   some news:rWAlN.50217$t8cc.38212@fx06.iad:   
      
   > On 1/4/2024 7:07 AM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted   
   > child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:   
   >   
   >> In article <3YrlN.127872$Wp_8.406@fx17.iad>, wsjames123n@gmail.com   
   >> says...   
   >>>   
   >>> So, what if the Supreme Court affirms the Colorado supreme court   
   >>> decision that said Trump engaged in insurrection, and that he is   
   >>> thereby disqualified from seeking the presdency? Or, what if they   
   >>> refuse to hear the appeal, and now other states reach the same   
   >>> conclusion and keep the insurrectionist-in-chief off their ballots?   
   >>> What *will* the Trumpswabs do then?   
   >>>   
   >>> I'm not suggesting I think that's likely ? I think it's unlikely ?   
   >>> but it's not out of the realm of possibility. In the first "what   
   >>> if," the SCOTUS might even affirm the holding that Trump engaged in   
   >>> insurrection, and then go on to say that he has to be kept off *all*   
   >>> ballots in *all* states. Not likely, but not inconceivable. What   
   >>> *will* right-wingnut traitors do then? Will they start another   
   >>> insurrection? If so, that will end *very* badly for them.   
   >>>   
   >>> If the SCOTUS agrees to take up the case (I don't see how they   
   >>> can't), that army of *ultra-conservative* legal scholars ? Baude,   
   >>> Paulsen, Luttig, et al. ? who have made the case that Trump is   
   >>> disqualified all are going to file /amicus curiae/ briefs with the   
   >>> court. These lawyers *know* the right-wingnut justices on the court   
   >>> ? they socialize with them, eat lunch with them. Does anyone think   
   >>> that Gorsuch and Kavanaugh and Covid-Barrett are not going to read   
   >>> the briefs from their fellow Federalist Society members ? and   
   >>> lunch-mates ? and carefully consider their briefs for why Trump   
   >>> (insurrectionist-in-chief) is disqualified? That doesn't necessarily   
   >>> mean they will agree with them, but they will give those briefs   
   >>> supporting Trump's disqualification very great consideration.   
   >>>   
   >>> What *will* you Nazi fuckscum do if SCOTUS rules against Trump...and   
   >>> against *you* Nazi insurrectionist filth? If that comes to pass,   
   >>> what I *hope* you do is riot in the streets, and get gunned down   
   >>> like the rabid filth you are. The very best outcome of the January   
   >>> 06 2021 insurrection ? *yes*, it was an insurrection ? would have   
   >>> been if several hundred, perhaps thousands, of filthy   
   >>> insurrectionists had been shot. If something like that happens   
   >>> again, it is almost a guarantee that Trumpswab insurrectionists'   
   >>> blood will be flowing freely in the streets. Patriotic Americans   
   >>> will cheer.   
   >>>   
   >>> Death to Trumpswabs   
   >>   
   >> Bring it bitch.   
   >   
   > Ha ha ha! *HA HA HA HA HA*! I'm nothing but a laptop gangster,   
      
   Gunner always said that about you.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)