XPost: talk.politics.misc, misc.education, alt.education   
   XPost: alt.politics.republicans, alt.politics.democrats.d   
   From: mars1933@hotmail.com   
      
       The former White nations and Japan are the first world. The Black   
   nations and India are the third world. In the middle, or the second   
   world are the Arabs and China. It is just as racialists would predict.   
   It is because the White race is on average much more intelligent than   
   the Black race. The people in Japan are much lighter in color than the   
   people in India.   
      
       All IQ tests have proven that Whites are on average much more   
   intelligent than Blacks. White people invented just about everything   
   important. Most leftists admit that Whites on average score higher on   
   the tests. They have their excuses for it, but all of their excuses   
   are demolished in "My Awakening" by David Duke. Here is an example:   
      
        "One of the most powerful direct studies of race and environment   
   was conducted by psychologists Sandra Scarr, Richard Weinberg and I.   
   D. Waldman. All three were quite well-known for their environmental   
   opinions. The study analyzed White, Black, and Mixed-race adopted   
   children in more than 100 White families in Minnesota. The study was   
   an egalitarian's dream, because the children's adoptive parents had   
   prestigious levels of income and education and were anti-racist enough   
   to adopt a Black child into their own family. Scarr is a strong   
   defender of racial equality and maintained that environment played an   
   almost exclusive role in IQ differences between the races. Scarr   
   supports the importance of heredity in causing individual differences   
   within a race, but she has argued that between-race differences are   
   mostly environmental.   
      
      The children in the study included Whites, Blacks, and Mulattos as   
   well as the biological children of the White adoptive couples. At the   
   age of 7, the children were tested for IQ, and all of the groups   
   including the Blacks and Mulattos, scored above average in IQ. Scarr   
   and Weinberg published a paper claiming to have proven the almost   
   exclusive power of environment over race in IQ, even though they had   
   to admit that the White children, whether adopted or not, scored well   
   above the Black and Mulatto children and that the Mulatto children   
   scored above the Blacks. (88)   
      
      A decade later, when the children reached the age of 17, a   
   follow-up study was conducted that that again included IQ   
   measurements. As they matured, Black children had dropped back to an   
   average of 89 in IQ, which is the average IQ for Blacks in the region   
   of the United States where the study was done. The White adopted   
   children scored an average of 106 in IQ, 17 points higher than the   
   Black children, which is consistant with traditional studies of Black   
   and White IQ differences. In line with genetic theory the half-White,   
   half-Black Mulatto adopted children scored almost exactly between the   
   adopted Whites and Blacks. (89)   
      
     RESULTS OF MINNESOTA TRANSRACIAL ADOPTION STUDY   
      
                                                                   IQ   
      
           Parental IQ                                       115.35   
           Biological Children                            109.4   
          White Adopted children                     105.6   
           Mulatto parents adopted children       98.5   
           Black parents adopted children            89.4   
      
        Scarr and Wienberg reluctantly published their data from the   
   follow up survey, but they waited close to four years to do so, almost   
   as if they were embarrassed by what they had found. Through a tortured   
   reasoning process, they still argued that environment played a   
   dominant role in IQ. But in their follow-up survey, unlike their first   
   paper, they also admitted that genes had an important impact as well.   
   Both Richard Lynn and Michael Levin effectively showed in their   
   re-analysis of Scarr's own data, that genes clearly comprise the   
   dominant role in intelligence levels of those adopted children. (90)   
   (91)"   
      
   (88)  Scarr, S, & Weinberg R. A. (1976). IQ Test Perfomance of Black   
   Children Adopted By  White Families. American Psychologist. Vol. 31.   
   p.26-739   
      
   (89)  Weinberg, R. A. , Scarr, S., & Waldman, I. D. (1992). The   
   Minnesota Transracial Adoption Study. A Follow-Up of IQ Test   
   Performance at Adolescence, Intelligence. Vol 16.   
   p.17-135   
      
   (90)  Lynn, R. (1994). Reinterpretations Of The Minnesota Transracial   
   Adoption Study. Intelligence. Vol. 19. p.1-27   
      
   (91)  Levin, M. (1994). Comment on The Minnesota Transracial Adoption   
   Study. Intelligence Vol. 19. p.3-20   
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
   http://www.ihr.org/      http://www.natvan.com   
      
   http://www.thebirdman.org     http://www.nsm88.com/   
      
   http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)