9210b2f5
XPost: soc.culture.african.american, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: jasptowsnigs@everychance.com
The personality type attracted to the post/function/role of net nanny is
extremely well described in the professional literature. The description is
so good that even the untrained observer after only a first reading is able
to make a positive identification. It is better described than any other
aberrant personality type.
According to the literature they tend to be emotionally and sexually
immature. Personal relations are a nightmare for them, more so for the
object of their attention. They just cannot cope with other people
especially those of their "preferred sex". They are described as being
highly
authoritarian and very seriously pedantic. Taking the highly authoritarian
aspect first, they defer to and are weak with the strong (others who have
some sort of control or hold on them). They tend to identify with an
individual more disturbed than themselves agreeing to the point of
groveling with every thing the "leader" has to say. There is usually a
strong component of homo-eroticism in this sort of relationship. They make
and
generally are excellent arse lickers.
On the other hand they "kick the shit" out of those they regard as weaker or
inferior to them. They are the sort of people who when asked to kill people
only ask how many and how often. Pedantry, in this type of personality,
is a consuming and all pervading passion. In newsgroups they tend to examine
messages for spelling, punctuation, grammar, query syntax, whether the
message is on topic, and general netetiquet before getting down to the
message contained in the posting. If they do get down to the message they
have nothing to contribute and bizarrely may even congratulate you for being
on topic etc.
A word to the wise. They are very easily offended because of their basic
underlying pathology. Being rigid and unable to make concessions or to admit
they may be "mistaken" every disagreement is taken as a personal slight.
Coupled with their inability to correct misinformed notions and their
lack of adaptability they tend to have ill balanced aims way out of
proportion to any perceived slight. Responses to perceived slights are
always over the top. War can break out over the miss-spelling of a word, a
miss-placed punctuation mark, or minor difference of opinion. Cause indeed
to have you banned from the Net. They fall out at the drop of comma! The
paradox is that they are so full up with shit themselves that they do their
best to
put everyone down so as to cover up their own inadequacies.
Newsgroups, are ideal for them partly because face to face
relationships are not just a nightmare for them, but anyone within a
50 mile radius and partly because each group has a "charter"
which they can refer to. A weapon with which to keep us all in line.
A number of news groups are so badly infested that they either
become deserted or the domain of one small "clique", ruined for
everyone else. It is best to remember that inter-personal relations
of any kind always become a veritable nightmare for them.
"pyjamarama" wrote in message
news:29007eb5-41af-414e-af66-aace61a9360e@m1g2000pre.googlegroups.com...
On Apr 12, 4:26 pm, Nick...@Click.com wrote:
Which of these would your alt.flame.ni**er buddies disagree with,
fuckwit?
Hmmmm???
Gary "Nick" Roselles on blacks (Source: Google Archives):
On 18 Feb 2007 14:05:28 -0700 Gary Roselles "Then
why was you mother stupid enough to fuck all them black guys?"
On 30 Oct 2006 11:13:21 -0800, Gary Roselles wrote:
"brown niggers need to be taken out"
On 23 Aug 2006 04:29:00 -0700, Gary Roselles
wrote: "What the fuck would a dumb cocksucker like (distinguished
black scholar) Sowell, who sits out at Stanford, never having worked a
day in his Uncle Tom life, know anything?"
On 24 Apr 2001 17:43:01 GMT Gary Roselles wrote (in
reply to an Op-Ed by African-American Rev. Jesse Lee Peterson): 'Say
"yes Massa", Uncle Tom.'
On Jun 6, 09:33:41, C...@Knicklas.com wrote of distinguished African-
American scholars Thomas Sowell and Walter Williams: "Both are
traitors to their race"
On Thu, 28 Dec 2000 19:27:54 GMT, Gary Roselles
wrote: "Bush's Uncle tom Cabinet is good first step
for GOP"
On Thu, 28 Dec 2000 19:27:54 GMT, Gary Roselles
wrote:"You actually think that placing blackskinned, white thinking
people is going to gain anything with real minorities?"
On 2 Jul 2005 10:43:03 -0800, Gary Roselles wrote:
"because of their rap speech"
On 18 Dec 2000 20:26:48 GMT Gary Roselles wrote (of
Colin Powell): "It's apparant[sic] he's being an uncle tom to appease
voters."
On Fri, 16 Mar 2001 06:43:37 GMT Gary Roselles
wrote (of Michael Steele): "GOP Poised to Pick Uncle Tom in MD"
On 30 Jun 2005 8:51:19 -0800, Gary Roselles wrote:
"They talk in black english"
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
