XPost: soc.culture.african.american, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh   
   From: jasptowsnigs@everychance.com   
      
   yes, they are pretty easy to spot   
      
   the obsession with 'nyms' is a sure give-away   
      
   they are also experts ar net-kopping those whose views do not match their   
   own   
      
   Jasp   
      
      
    wrote in message   
   news:5j2a04h0o9ijd77u4qur75053dnd31553p@4ax.com...   
   > On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 18:33:44 GMT, "Jasper Towing Ltd."   
   >  wrote:   
   >   
   > >The personality type attracted to the post/function/role of net nanny is   
   > >extremely well described in the professional literature. The description   
   is   
   > >so good that even the untrained observer after only a first reading is   
   able   
   > >to make a positive identification. It is better described than any other   
   > >aberrant personality type.   
   > >   
   > >   
   > >According to the literature they tend to be emotionally and sexually   
   > >immature. Personal relations are a nightmare for them, more so for the   
   > >object of their attention. They just cannot cope with other people   
   > >especially those of their "preferred sex". They are described as being   
   > >highly   
   > >authoritarian and very seriously pedantic. Taking the highly   
   authoritarian   
   > >aspect first, they defer to and are weak with the strong (others who have   
   > >some sort of control or hold on them). They tend to identify with an   
   > >individual more disturbed than themselves agreeing to the point of   
   > >groveling with every thing the "leader" has to say. There is usually a   
   > >strong component of homo-eroticism in this sort of relationship. They   
   make   
   > >and   
   > >   
   > >generally are excellent arse lickers.   
   > >   
   > >   
   > >On the other hand they "kick the shit" out of those they regard as weaker   
   or   
   > >inferior to them. They are the sort of people who when asked to kill   
   people   
   > >only ask how many and how often. Pedantry, in this type of personality,   
   > >is a consuming and all pervading passion. In newsgroups they tend to   
   examine   
   > >messages for spelling, punctuation, grammar, query syntax, whether the   
   > >message is on topic, and general netetiquet before getting down to the   
   > >message contained in the posting. If they do get down to the message they   
   > >have nothing to contribute and bizarrely may even congratulate you for   
   being   
   > >on topic etc.   
   > >   
   > >   
   > >A word to the wise. They are very easily offended because of their basic   
   > >underlying pathology. Being rigid and unable to make concessions or to   
   admit   
   > >they may be "mistaken" every disagreement is taken as a personal slight.   
   > >   
   > >Coupled with their inability to correct misinformed notions and their   
   > >lack of adaptability they tend to have ill balanced aims way out of   
   > >proportion to any perceived slight. Responses to perceived slights are   
   > >always over the top. War can break out over the miss-spelling of a word,   
   a   
   > >miss-placed punctuation mark, or minor difference of opinion. Cause   
   indeed   
   > >to have you banned from the Net. They fall out at the drop of comma! The   
   > >paradox is that they are so full up with shit themselves that they do   
   their   
   > >best to   
   > >put everyone down so as to cover up their own inadequacies.   
   > >   
   > >Newsgroups, are ideal for them partly because face to face   
   > >relationships are not just a nightmare for them, but anyone within a   
   > >50 mile radius and partly because each group has a "charter"   
   > >which they can refer to. A weapon with which to keep us all in line.   
   > >A number of news groups are so badly infested that they either   
   > >become deserted or the domain of one small "clique", ruined for   
   > >everyone else. It is best to remember that inter-personal relations   
   > >of any kind always become a veritable nightmare for them.   
   > >   
   > >   
   > >   
   > >"pyjamarama"  wrote in message   
   > >news:29007eb5-41af-414e-af66-aace61a9360e@m1g2000pre.googlegroups.com...   
   > >On Apr 12, 4:26 pm, Nick...@Click.com wrote:   
   > >   
   > >Which of these would your alt.flame.ni**er buddies disagree with,   
   > >fuckwit?   
   > >   
   > >Hmmmm???   
   > >   
   > >   
   > >   
   > >Gary "Nick" Roselles on blacks (Source: Google Archives):   
   > >   
   > >On 18 Feb 2007 14:05:28 -0700 Gary Roselles  "Then   
   > >why was you mother stupid enough to fuck all them black guys?"   
   > >   
   > >On 30 Oct 2006 11:13:21 -0800, Gary Roselles wrote:   
   > >"brown niggers need to be taken out"   
   > >   
   > >On 23 Aug 2006 04:29:00 -0700, Gary Roselles    
   > >wrote: "What the fuck would a dumb cocksucker like (distinguished   
   > >black scholar) Sowell, who sits out at Stanford, never having worked a   
   > >day in his Uncle Tom life, know anything?"   
   > >   
   > >On 24 Apr 2001 17:43:01 GMT Gary Roselles  wrote (in   
   > >reply to an Op-Ed by African-American Rev. Jesse Lee Peterson): 'Say   
   > >"yes Massa", Uncle Tom.'   
   > >   
   > >On Jun 6, 09:33:41, C...@Knicklas.com wrote of distinguished African-   
   > >American scholars Thomas Sowell and Walter Williams: "Both are   
   > >traitors to their race"   
   > >   
   > >On Thu, 28 Dec 2000 19:27:54 GMT, Gary Roselles   
   > >wrote: "Bush's Uncle tom Cabinet is good first step   
   > >for GOP"   
   > >   
   > >On Thu, 28 Dec 2000 19:27:54 GMT, Gary Roselles    
   > >wrote:"You actually think that placing blackskinned, white thinking   
   > >people is going to gain anything with real minorities?"   
   > >   
   > >On 2 Jul 2005 10:43:03 -0800, Gary Roselles  wrote:   
   > >"because of their rap speech"   
   > >   
   > >On 18 Dec 2000 20:26:48 GMT Gary Roselles  wrote (of   
   > >Colin Powell): "It's apparant[sic] he's being an uncle tom to appease   
   > >voters."   
   > >   
   > >On Fri, 16 Mar 2001 06:43:37 GMT Gary Roselles    
   > >wrote (of Michael Steele): "GOP Poised to Pick Uncle Tom in MD"   
   > >   
   > >On 30 Jun 2005 8:51:19 -0800, Gary Roselles  wrote:   
   > >"They talk in black english"   
   > >   
   > >   
   > >   
   > >   
   > >   
   > >   
   > >   
   > >   
   > >   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >===========================================================================   
   ==================   
   >   
   > On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 08:49:05 -0700 (PDT), Rightwinghank   
    wrote:   
   >   
   > >> On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 09:08:15 -0700 (PDT), pyjamarama   
   >   
   > >Its still a free country...and if someone doesnt want to hire a nigger   
   > >like yourself forinstance...because they dont want a smelly lazy stealing   
   stupid semi   
   > >human working for them....more power to em.   
   > >   
   > >Now..if you have a federal contract...then you MUST have 10 percent   
   > >minorites working for you...   
   >   
   > >THAT is why there are so many niggas employed in Washington DC in the   
   > >Goverment.   
   >   
   > >Otherwise...we could use trained monkeys to do the same and save some   
   > >bucks.   
   > >   
   > >love ya   
   > >hank   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)