XPost: talk.politics.misc, alt.politics.bush, alt.politics.liberalism   
   XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh   
   From: mars1933@hotmail.com   
      
   No Way Out But Through the Jews   
   A Review of Paul Gottfried's The Conservative Movement   
   by Alex Linder   
      
   Executive summary: The Jews have taken over the American right, and   
   they have the money and media access to shut out any contenders.   
   Meaning: Unless you build a movement that explicitly forbids Jewish   
   participation and focuses on Jews as the political enemy, you are   
   destined to be coopted or crushed. Or at least rendered impotent, like   
   the Old Right, and left broke and fuming on the sidelines. Caveat: The   
   Internet isn't accounted for in Gottfried's calculus.   
      
   ...the review   
      
   In his 1993 book The Conservative Movement, Jew Paul Gottfried   
   provides an excellent short history of post-WWII conservatism, and one   
   that provides a clear, if implicit, message for today's White   
   nationalist. That message is the title of this review: No way out but   
   through the Jews. If you plan to pursue the political goal of a   
   civilized White America, these Jews will be at your throat every step   
   of the way. So you might as well not kid yourself about that but set   
   your phaser on "kill" from the start.   
      
   Gottfried never comes right out and says it, but the upshot of his   
   history is that the right has been taken over by Jews. Centered around   
   the Podhoretz and Kristol families, this Jewish movement pushes an   
   anti-American ideology. Where George Washington and Thomas Jefferson   
   advocated no entangling alliances abroad and local rule at home, the   
   neocons promote a plus-sized managerial state at home, and global   
   democratic crusades abroad. Since their infiltration in the late   
   sixties, early seventies, says Gottfried, these Jewish "conservatives"   
   have garnered the lion's share of money and media access,   
   marginalizing the traditional right. And although he nowhere mentions   
   talk radio or the Internet, Gottfried sees virtually no options at the   
   disposal of those who would usurp the usurpers.   
      
   Who are the neoconservatives? Essentially, they are a small group of   
   East Coast Jewish intellectuals of regular private morality. They are   
   former reds or red-diaper babies who departed from the New Left when   
   it started advocating odd sex and communism and other policies they   
   felt were potentially anti-Semitic. As they emerged from this sixties   
   morass, they gravitated to the right, where they found allies in the   
   anti-communist cause; friends with foundation money that could be used   
   to construct a bulwark against their crazier New Left brethren. Over   
   the course of the seventies, the Jewish neoconservatives took over one   
   foundation after another, supplanting the Christian traditionalist   
   bias of American conservatism with their detailed policy studies and   
   position papers. These bore proof of their sociological and   
   statistical cast of mind, different from the Kirkian   
   religious-literary bias of traditionalists.   
      
   By the time of Reagan, they had achieved dominance. Any conservative   
   hoping to make a career of it, whether in politics or writing or   
   commentating, had to hew to their specific vision of the America they   
   wished to conserve if he wished to preserve his own office, air-time   
   or sheet space. Any vestigial strains of racial feeling or regional   
   sympathy were anathema to these racist philo-Semitic anti-racists who   
   are unstinting in their anathematizing of anyone who diverges from   
   their pluralist, democratic dogmas. Any American, that is. The   
   dogmatic democratic pluralism disappears when it comes to Israel,   
   where Semitic chauvinism is, quite rightly they think, the law. What   
   White racialists want for America is no different from what Jewish   
   neoconservatives want for Israel. But they will try to shout down   
   anyone who makes the equation, just ask Joe Sobran. Only Jews have a   
   right to an ethnostate; democratic pluralism is good enough for the   
   rest of us. This hypocritical double-standard springs directly from   
   the gut Jewish feeling that an America made up of many conflicting   
   groups, riven by cultural standards, divided by ethnicity, history and   
   behavior, is the America in which the Jew is safest, and can move   
   about most freely. A strong, sure White nation scares the Jew. So   
   whether it's America or Europe, he tries to undercut it with   
   anthropological lies about the unreality of race, falsified histories   
   ("diversity has always been our greatest strength") support for open   
   immigration, suppression of free speech and the destruction of free   
   association-all in the name of "civil rights." Neoconservatives are   
   Jews, no need to look further than that. Jews, whether left or right,   
   ask only one question: Is it good for the Jews? They hide behind   
   universalist rhetoric, but their concern is for themselves. And you   
   can be absolutely sure of this: Their interests are not our   
   interests..   
      
   David Horowitz would be a prime example of an expert deployer of a   
   plausible, counterfeit theory and history of America to suck in   
   potential White racialists and get them four-square behind a nutty,   
   extremist, ahistorical view of politics that can only lead America   
   into South Africa's pit of horrors. The triumph of individual rights   
   in Black lands means the triumph of the jungle. It is extremist,   
   rationalist and counter-historical to elevate a political process over   
   the character of the people. How can ignorant, 75-IQ blacks produce   
   civilization protecting the individual rights these neoconservatives   
   claim to love? Can one-man, one-vote really produce that miracle? Of   
   course not, and these Jews know it. And they know that the Founders   
   knew it. So they lie. The truth, as they know and cover up, is that   
   the Founders understood that only civilized, self-controlled White men   
   were capable of civilization, and that to expect dissolute, lazy,   
   TV-drenched slobs mixed with mulattoes and Negroes and Mexicans to   
   vote in ordered liberty was to expect the impossible. But David   
   Horowitz, living in Los Angeles, can look out the window and tell you   
   it's possible. Never underestimate the power of Jewish duplicity in   
   furthering Jewish self-interest. That's a second corollary to   
   Gottfried's study.   
      
   We asked above whether or not these neoconservative Jews were really   
   conservative. Perhaps that question isn't important. One point   
   Gottfried does develop, writing in 1993, is just how little difference   
   there is in today's political discourse between left and right. As I   
   write, George W. Bush is battling Al Gore, so the point is hardly   
   stale. Effectively, the left and right may differ in degree, but   
   everybody supports a capitalist welfare state and global democracy.   
   Everybody is "inclusive." Everybody bows before the great God of   
   Diversity. Are the Jews conservative? In the deeper sense, no. They   
   are still radicals, intent on spreading their lies about human   
   fungibility, from which they aone are exempt as the "Chosen" people.   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)