XPost: alt.postmodern   
   From: spam@msn.com   
      
   On 18 Feb 2004 05:13:10 -0800, zap_25@yahoo.com (Zap) wrote:   
      
   >Kevin Calder  wrote in message news:<   
   8dzyxA3AqMAFw44@cableinet.co.uk>...   
   >>    
   >>   
   >> Regardless, would a, *ahem*, radical-relativist be willing to concede   
   >> that it is science and technology that "makes them work"?  Possibly I   
   >> suppose.  Though I doubt that the radical-sceptic would.   
   >>   
   >> Also, does sufficiently radical relativism become solipsism?   
   >>   
   >> ta,   
   >   
   >hmz... this reminds me to something I wrote not too long ago.   
   >First I wrote an article about the Nihilist Jihad... it doesn't get   
   >more radically sceptic than that. Note the blatant contraditcion   
   >between Nihilism and the (religiously laden term) Jihad.   
   >In MJ#6 there will be more about the Nihilist Jihad, and how   
   >ingeniously it uses (physical) terrorism to distract from a far more   
   >widespread movement that would make the powers that be soil their   
   >pants. Which they would if we hadn't made sure they constantly   
   >misunderestimated us.   
      
   As an aside, my attempt to join the 'Nihilist Assault Group' back in   
   September was thwarted by the fact that their mailing list appeared to   
   be in Norwegian..   
      
   http://www.nihilistassaultgroup.org/   
   --   
   Iain x   http://18hz.com   
      
   "I wouldn't tell people that Father Christmas didn't exist - it's the   
   same as that" http://www.eclipse.co.uk/thoughts/noblelie.htm   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)