Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.cyberpunk    |    Ohh just weirdo cyber/steampunk chat    |    2,235 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,294 of 2,235    |
|    Chris S. to David Harper    |
|    Re: Artificial Intelligence in Governmen    |
|    28 Jul 04 03:13:16    |
      XPost: comp.robotics.misc, comp.ai.philosophy       From: chrisks@NOSPAMudel.edu              David Harper wrote:              > I was interested in hearing some people's views on AI eventually       > evolving to the point where it could aid in (or even become?)       > government. Yes, yes... this question was spurred after seeing "I,       > Robot", although I don't think did justice to Asimov's stories. I'm       > not sure how often this topic has been discussed before, but a 'quick'       > search did not show any previous discussions (although I'm pretty sure       > there's plenty).       >       > For those not familiar with Asimov's fiction, Multivac is a common       > "character" in some of his short stories. It's usually a computer       > that is constantly fed data, analyzes problems facing humanity, and       > outputs solutions in accordance with the 3 (or 4) laws.       >       > So the question I'm posing is this:       >       > In your opinion, could a future government that incorporates       > artificial intelligence govern humanity better than a strictly       > human-run government?       >       > This question is open to interpretation, and can include AI subject to       > additional (or different) laws than the 3 (or 4) traditional ones.       >       > I'm holding my personal views back until other people throw in their       > two cents, but I'm looking forward to the comments!       >       > Dave       >              Was I the only one rooting for the mainframe in I Robot? You've got to       admit, it had a good point. We've not always proven worthy of our freedoms.              In regards to your original question, of course. Assuming its eventual       technical feasibility, a computer assisted or fully automated government       would undoubtably be less corrupt and inefficient than its human based       equivalent. Although I don't think we'll ever give up *full* control.       Naturally, the end result will depend on who creates it. After all, a       computer is only a smart as the human who programs it.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca