Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.cyberpunk    |    Ohh just weirdo cyber/steampunk chat    |    2,235 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,806 of 2,235    |
|    Kevin Calder to All    |
|    Re: William Gibson - Pattern Recognition    |
|    18 Feb 07 16:20:41    |
      From: kevin.calder@onetel.net              Hello no one.              I finally got around to reading Pattern Recognition, and I thought I'd       share my thoughts on it with you, the mysterious semi-present population       of alt.cp.              [spoilers, imho, ymmv e.t.c. y'all know I'm a pomowhore and don't even       really believe books can be good\bad e.t.c.]              To be honest I didn't particularly enjoy it, but I didn't loathe it       either, and on both counts I think this is because the whole book is       just so damn neutral. The main character, who's particular mutant super       powers and endless open questions make her seem like an unlively joke       from sex in the city, just seems like such a dead end. Actually she       embodies nothing as sudden, dramatic or extreme as death. She is more       like a sleep end. Gibson insists on emphasizing 300 times per chapter       just how terribly, terribly tired she is and on top of that expends a       surprising amount of verbiage detailing her going to bed at every       possible opportunity. This is certainly realistic, but its just not       that interesting and if you set her sitc-mutant power aside, it's the       second most remarkable thing about her. Which is a shame. I mean, a       simple "The next day Casey blah blah blah..." would have sufficed for       9/10 bed times.              While Gibson lavishes almost unbearable detail on her sleep and       sleepyness, disappointingly he also consistently manages to dodge       detailing anything more interesting. There don't seem to be any       interesting ideas in this book at all; rich marketing yuppies drinking       lattes in starbucks reading their hotmail on their ibooks and getting       hilariously mixed up in a big misunderstanding with the Russian mob over       some incredibly dubious plan to distribute some kind of dubious 'high       art' version of LonelyGirl, it just seemed very bland to me.              But its nicely written. WG has certainly worked on his prose, and its       slick and spare and economical and all that, but I think this is part of       the problem. I am pretty sure WG is the kind of author who researches       ideas for his novels, but once he filters this information through his       now very tightly focused Gibsonian 'lens-o-cool-detachedness' everything       get stripped down so much that all you get is a few vague (though I       expect he hopes profound or sublime) evocations, that he only seems       slightly interested in, and even then only in passing.              I know you don't read Gibson for the exposition, but in the absence of       exploration of interesting ideas, I'd really like the novel in question       to be something of a page-turner.              In this respect PR reminds me of the Da Vinci Code, though sadly more       like the film than the book, i.e. trivial yet dull, rather than       (allegedly) trivial yet compelling. Actually I didn't read the book,       but you've all heard about it so you get the idea. Why is PR so damn       slow, and why in all that slowness does nothing very much happen? I       think Gibson has become too cool to write anything exciting. Getting       excited is pretty much the very opposite of cool detached indifference.       Maybe.              Anyone else feel the same, or totally different, or hate me and the       (dead)horse I rode in on, or none of the above, or just plain wish       *they* were dead?                     WG: Can you power up your eyemac and get someone to show you what       usenet is so that you can tell me when you are going to reprint a       version of Necromancer with no spelling mistakes in it??!?!??              [Ok, that was a cheapshot. Please disreguard.]              [end rant]              Zip,              --       Kevin Calder              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca