Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.cyberpunk    |    Ohh just weirdo cyber/steampunk chat    |    2,235 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 446 of 2,235    |
|    Omixochitl to FixinDixon    |
|    Re: Global Politics Quiz    |
|    06 Nov 03 10:56:12    |
      From: Omixochitl2002@yahoo.com              u01mzb@abdn.ac.uk (FixinDixon) wrote in news:51f64020.0311060149.1f5eccf2       @posting.google.com:              >> Despite the big differences we have from our very distant cousins,       >> when you boil everything down our behavioral dynamics is an exact       >> match to the behavioral dynamics of chimps, and to some extent,       >> gorillas.       >       > Then explain Homosexuality. It does not produce an increased       > reproductive fitness, it does not benefit the culture in any tangible              Yes it does, as long as it's a *recessive* gene and can be passed on by       heterosexual individuals who carry the gene. Kinship selection is not       limited to helping one's own offspring survive, but also includes helping       other young kin survive.              Your brother or sister most likely has 50% of your genes.       Your niece or nephew most likely has 25% of your genes.              Now if a couple are both carriers of a recessive gene then the odds are       1/4 that a given son or daughter of theirs will have 2 copies, 2/4 that       s/he will be a carrier, and 1/4 that s/he will have 0 copies.              OK, what about survival? In species with "r-strategy" reproduction (have       tons of offspring, at least some will keep themselves alive), this is       irrelevant. In species with "K-strategy" reproduction (have a few       offspring and try to keep all of them alive), this is very relevant. So,       in a "K-strategy" species:              - Who's more likely to survive and pass on genes? S/he who has only       parental care? Or s/he who has Mom and Dad *and* an aunt or uncle or two       caring for her?              - Who's most likely to be a carrier for some recessive gene which makes       adults nonreproductive and healthy? S/he who has carrier parents and       nonreproductive aunts and uncles, or s/he who doesn't?              Thus, having aunts and uncles who don't reproduce and spend their "care       for related kin" instincts on nieces and nephews instead is a survival       trait. In other words, one's being likely a *carrier* of a recessive       gene for homosexuality would increase reproductive fitness because it       increases the odds of one's surviving childhood living long enough to       reproduce.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca