Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.cyberpunk    |    Ohh just weirdo cyber/steampunk chat    |    2,235 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 626 of 2,235    |
|    Omixochitl to FixinDixon    |
|    Re: Global Politics Quiz    |
|    28 Nov 03 19:52:08    |
      From: Omixochitl2002@yahoo.com              u01mzb@abdn.ac.uk (FixinDixon) wrote in       news:51f64020.0311280752.63b38ebd@posting.google.com:              > I'm not saying that evolution is not ongoing. Of course it       > is...that's the point of evolution. What I'm saying (sigh) is that       > Homo Sapiens Sapiens, OUR species, will eventually change into a new,       > maybe improved species. This species will NOT BE Homo Sapiens       > Sapiens. It will be another different species. Perhaps I wasn't       > clear enough, so apologies fo that. We, or our descendants, are not       > going to suddenly all develop new characteristics overnight. One of              Good point. Nor are we going to suddenly all lose old characteristics       overnight (those useless little toes don't seem to be going anywhere soon       - no matter what an ex-dorm-neighbor of mine who knew "evolution means       change" and wasn't creationist or anything but still had no clue how       natural selection worked says).              > our children will have a peculiar adaptation that allows it to       > function better in our world. This will be passed down throught it's       > offspring and so on until enough of them exist to be classified as a              Actually, they wouldn't be classified as a new species unless they can't       have fertile offspring with the rest of us.              > new species. Because every parent wants the best for their child,       > adults will mate in this new species so their child gets the best              OTOH, parents wanting the best for their children also helps slow down       the process of evolution.              Sometimes someone who has lousy genes wants to make babies instead of       adopting or not having kids. Sometimes someone marries and makes babies       with someone else despite that person having lousy genes (the two are in       love, the more-lousy-gened one is rich, the two believe their grandfather       when he says "a match between cousins is a match made in heaven," the       less-lousy-gened one is desperate to marry anyone, whatever).              And once they make babies who have these lousy genes, sometimes they       actually make an effort to keep these babies alive and help them grow up       into adults instead of letting natural selection weed out said lousy       genes from the population.              Likewise for the hypothetical peculiar advantageous adaptation you       mention above - whether that adaptation becomes the majority depends on       whether the people who don't have it can still grow up and stay alive and       have kids, or whether they're somehow denied medical care, or whether       they're all lined up against a wall and shot.              > genes possible. Eventually, because Homo Sapiens Sapiens is no longer       > mating amongst itself, it will die out as a species and the new one       > will carry on.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca