Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.cyberpunk.tech    |    Cyberpunks LOVE making shit complicated    |    1,115 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 238 of 1,115    |
|    MasterKarsten to Cyberdroid    |
|    Re: A Constitution for the Free Internet    |
|    12 Oct 25 12:20:03    |
      From: soulkarsten@gmail.com              TheSun, 12 Oct 2025 10:09:22 +0200, Cyberdroid wrote:              > Am 12.10.25 um 02:31 schrieb novanon:       >> I think we should write a form of constitution that should govern the       >> Internet. If we can design a few basic rules and common liberties that       >> should be available to everyone, we can start lobbying for those       >> liberties around the world.       >>       >> I'll start with an easy one:       >>       >>> A well regulated VPN Service, being necessary for the security of a       >>> free       >> Internet, the right of the people to anonymize and encrypt their       >> traffic, shall not be infringed.       >       > I think this is nonsense, to be frank. We are not "world citizens",       > "netizens" or whatever. We are bound to the (cultural) rules and       > regulations of the respective countries we live in. If you live in a       > country that doesn't even have the concept of freedom of speech or       > privacy to begin with, your demands will fall on deaf ears and you'd       > have to approach this thing from a more fundamental level of cultural       > change. The majority of people in the world doesn't live in countries       > with freedom of speech, freedom of expression or a right to privacy.       > Think about China, the islamic world or most parts of Africa. We are       > basically talking about implementing something that only exists in       > western countries.       >       > And when it comes to the western world: We already know what we need and       > what to lobby for, based on our respective cultural values       > (enlightenment). We don't need some arbitrary document for that: Freedom       > of speech, the right to privacy, private correspondence and subsequently       > encryption.              As long an infrastructure exists, and it's resistant to takedowns, there       will be spaces of uncontrolled freedoom, one way or another                            --       ---/g/ on Usenet? Madness!---              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca