From: dreamvicinity@protonmail.com
MasterKarsten writes:
> TheSun, 12 Oct 2025 10:09:22 +0200, Cyberdroid wrote:
>
>> Am 12.10.25 um 02:31 schrieb novanon:
>>> I think we should write a form of constitution that should govern the
>>> Internet. If we can design a few basic rules and common liberties that
>>> should be available to everyone, we can start lobbying for those
>>> liberties around the world.
>>>
>>> I'll start with an easy one:
>>>
>>>> A well regulated VPN Service, being necessary for the security of a
>>>> free
>>> Internet, the right of the people to anonymize and encrypt their
>>> traffic, shall not be infringed.
>>
>> I think this is nonsense, to be frank. We are not "world citizens",
>> "netizens" or whatever. We are bound to the (cultural) rules and
>> regulations of the respective countries we live in. If you live in a
>> country that doesn't even have the concept of freedom of speech or
>> privacy to begin with, your demands will fall on deaf ears and you'd
>> have to approach this thing from a more fundamental level of cultural
>> change. The majority of people in the world doesn't live in countries
>> with freedom of speech, freedom of expression or a right to privacy.
>> Think about China, the islamic world or most parts of Africa. We are
>> basically talking about implementing something that only exists in
>> western countries.
>>
>> And when it comes to the western world: We already know what we need and
>> what to lobby for, based on our respective cultural values
>> (enlightenment). We don't need some arbitrary document for that: Freedom
>> of speech, the right to privacy, private correspondence and subsequently
>> encryption.
>
> As long an infrastructure exists, and it's resistant to takedowns, there
> will be spaces of uncontrolled freedoom, one way or another
Protocols > platforms. Always has been. Layer 7 was meant for the
client, not for the API call.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
