From: janrod@gmail.com
The first thing that comes to my mind is what "resolution" the fiber optic
has? Because when you reduce the image to such small size, there sure must
be some loss of resolution in the fiber optic - since I am not engineer and
I dunno nothing about fiber optic cables then the most basic stuff, I think
they're constructed only for two possibilities - light "on" and light "off",
am I right? And with this Gibsonian idea you should have fiber optic capable
of maintaining light differences through its surface - and is this possible?
what is actually the material structure of fiber optics? Just some more
ideas ;-)
"Mook23" píše v diskusním příspěvku
news:Yuhdf.6194$lb7.71016@news1.mts.net...
>I was doing a little bit of figuring the other day. I was wondering how
>small you can actually get an image with a good lense. Think about this,
>would it be possible to shrink an image small enough to be shot through a
>fiber-optic cable, reverse the process at teh other end and shoot it
>directly into the eye? I'm sort of describing the same technology William
>Gibson was talking about in Virtual Light. I suppose a little google
>search on fiberoptic cameras and how they work would give me a better
>understanding of the tech involved. Just an idea.
>
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
