XPost: alt.privacy.anon-server, rec.food.cooking   
   From: ultimathule@none.invalid   
      
   On 11/14/25 5:11 PM, ultima thule wrote:   
   > On 11/14/25 3:59 PM, Yamn Remailer wrote:   
   >> ultima thule  wrote:   
   >>> On 11/14/25 11:41 AM, ultima thule wrote:   
   >>>> webmail cannot be e2ee, simple as.   
   >>> okay well if all scripts and styles are hashed and correspond to code in   
   >>> a repo you can audit, then it's not strictly impossible.   
   >>   
   >> Is there any webbrowser capable of automatically doing such things with   
   >> each and every download of active contents?   
   >>   
   >> I don't think that's a realistic approach.  For me as a proud owner of a   
   >> computer, which allows the installation and usage of communication   
   >> software of my choice, there's no reason to accept such a risk.   
   >>   
   >   
   > not that i know of, but it's possible in principle.  you have to write   
   > pages with these things in mind.  i wrote a simple cryptography tool   
   > with one hash for