XPost: sci.astro.seti   
   From: pmeuser@cogeco.ca   
      
   "Matt Giwer"  wrote in message   
   news:jdj0g.116768$_c.82300@tornado.tampabay.rr.com...   
   > Patrick Ashley Meuser"-Bianca" wrote:   
   >> Matt et al,   
   >   
   > Look. I gave you my honest opinion. It did make more sense when it was a   
   > random phrases from a Noam Chomsky book. You want me to lie?   
   >   
   >> I've conversed with people like you in many discussion groups.  No one is   
   >> the same.  We're all unique, no matter how "frustrating" or unreadable   
   >> their post or language is.  I wish that people would take more time to   
   >> respect the author's.  Like your response, I've been called so   
   >> understandable by so many people, I think that there's an alien society   
   >> that has come between each of us.  BTW I'm the really true author of A   
   >> Theory of Universal Translation and VORTAL Matroid Analyis, Discrete   
   >> Systems in Non-Linear Space too.   
   >   
   > I doubt there is anyone vying to take credit for them. I would certainly   
   > never deny you the complete and total credit for them. I certainly want no   
   > connection with them.   
      
   That's if wans are internal though, close enough?   
      
   >> Really, what makes me so different from any one else in the universe,   
   >> involved in the work that I do, and some people think that simply because   
   >> the message has been transfigured at a time that such materials are truly   
   >> readable, by which, I think we should take the same effort we use to make   
   >> detractive phrase, we should advocate sentencing cells for authors like   
   >> me, to spend the same amount of time it takes the research to continue   
   >> with more people who have an understanding of it, instead of falling,   
   >> being over-extended.   
   >   
   > So publish your papers showing the work. Please no conspiracy against   
   > publishing your material. There is the internet and more than sufficient   
   > tools to create everything needed. In ten years paper-only publications   
   > will be quaintly archaic so get ahead of the curve.   
   >   
   > Post the URL when it is online and I'll take a look.   
   I'm working with a host that's borkering the deal, it'll be up soon I hope.   
   In fact if I never backed the site up to CD-ROM, I would've lost it.   
   Apparently it was hacked.  I'm pretty sure I beleive him.  The IT secotr in   
   this city is too tacit understand.   
   >> I mean, the only reason why I put up with it so far,   
   >   
   > You don't like honesty?   
   Sho nuff.   
   >> is because I usually blame myself for other peoples actions, but I'm   
   >> learning that this is truly unhealthy.  If you're trying to prove some   
   >> point, then find some people and build some sentencing cells.   
   >   
   > I was rather considering giving you a more spacious paragraphing cell but   
   > in you insist ...   
   Ahhhh.  The fact is computers are autonomous, a paragraph cell?  Still   
   detractive you are.   
   >> I'd gladly hang out for long enough to get my work, honestly, I'll   
   >> memorize it someday, when its complete, but I don't think there's any   
   >> liberty to this, once written also read, and unitl that time I'd be just   
   >> practicing.  I intend to get my doctorate   
   >   
   > Einstein didn't need one but how close are you and in what field?   
   Cybernetics   
   >> and publish these works in a world that respects them anyway.   
   >   
   > Use the internet and do it now.   
   When my URL is re-connected at least, I have expectations.   
   >> If for some reason you fall into the categorical reasoning of human   
   >> nature in terms that people are flaming trolls, and crack-pots, etc.  The   
   >> ony people who understand my work are so covert, they live in a world   
   >> where the WTC is still standing, without co-operating on reconstruction,   
   >> that I am, and so many other buildings that burnt down near me.   
   >   
   > Closer to the Chomsky book that.   
   Recommendation?   
   >> Its amazing how complacent we are to knowledge, as if a rich argument   
   >> could only be had if someone is held to such an understanding that they   
   >> do not yet possess, or that I represent anyone except my self, bad   
   >> mistake to make.   
   >   
   > That is even closer.   
   OK.   
   >> The reason why I post this is so more people who have even a brief   
   >> understanding of the sciences can bank on the credit that my work is   
   >> based, otherwise it is incomplete.  I dissed Wired, but only because   
   >> buildings in my comunity we're burning down at the time, and on the   
   >> cover, it reads Burn baby burn (The issue on FireFox).  I dissed Jay-Z as   
   >> an experiment.  But now I understand, everyone has their way to dis   
   >> someone, in fact I totally understand that its a component of this   
   >> culture that is far from complacent, but the verbal gynamistics that I   
   >> recognize are truly amazing that it remains to be seen that the true   
   >> detractors show up and dis me, then I'll live out the truth of JPS before   
   >> it happens, and it would serve to attract UFOs for those on quests to   
   >> discover.  The same as I've witnessed by combining my work on treks   
   >> throughout this nature, it is clearly amazing the things I've seen.  My   
   >> point is you can't blame someone for the way in which they come to   
   >> understand and learn, its beyond the superlative to avoid mistakes, we   
   >> all make them.  I just hope that everyone in the world understands this,   
   >> because it will beome difficult to unify the JPS without this basis.   
   >> Remember JPS is a mother-ship   
   >   
   > A father-ship actually.   
   Androgenous?   
   >> for all these UFOs to be superimposed and cloaked, their pilots will   
   >> never acheive this synergy without spending the correct amount of time in   
   >> the relegation of a sentencing cell, I understand, but there is no real   
   >> prison of the mind, its a metaphor that carries the JPS on its back, just   
   >> as its encryption level requires wait states consitent with restrictions   
   >> on encryption, don't restrict yourself in what you seek to communcate, it   
   >> makes a gamma invariant observer more difficult in its clemency already.   
   >   
   > Actually that is a delta contravariant. Close but a mistake often made.   
   >   
   >> You're obviously full of life and all caught up with something, but I   
   >> never let anyone make me out to be something that I wasn't ready for.   
   >> I've never responded to a post like your's before,   
   >   
   > It is probably the first attention you have gotten.   
   >   
   >> but its statements like that that reverse-bias a very serious domain, in   
   >> which our creativity is the cosmogyny that you could've elaborated, but   
   >> instead you make an oxymoronic comment about Chomsky (one of my idols).   
   >> It's also ironic that this domain makes room for its own covert   
   >> operations while people like myself are trying to conduct real business.   
   >> The nature of a game can be so childish I guess, but the truth is I've   
   >> yet to completely read Chomsky, so I can't confirm or deny it, but it is   
   >> possible that I've been too introverted and reverse biased the domain all   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)