Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.dildo-huggers    |    Uhh, those who listen to Steely Dan?    |    17 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 11 of 17    |
|    NO GAY BLOOD DONORS UNLESS IT IS FO to All    |
|    Mexican "Dr." wants FDA to let HIV infec    |
|    20 May 15 21:13:15    |
      XPost: alt.bathroom, aus.culture.lesbigay, alt.lefthanders       XPost: nz.soc.queer       From: jms@no-fag-blood.com              While I support the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) decision       to eliminate the lifetime ban on blood donations from gay men,       there are elements of the new policy that I do not agree with.       Under the new policy, men must abstain from having sex with       other men for 12 months before they can donate blood. To me,       this year-long period of abstinence does not make sense, nor       will it help to address the problems we face today.              It is important to have as many eligible blood donors as       possible because the commitment from the general public to       donate is sometimes forgotten as we get wrapped up in our daily       routines. As a result, our nation continues to struggle in       maintaining life-saving blood supplies in many areas and       hospitals. Under the new policy, we will continue to have these       issues as gay men remain limited as to when they can donate, so       the pool of potential donors will not grow significantly.              We have made tremendous progress in the medical community on how       we analyze blood. The sophistication of laboratory processing       for the screening of HIV is quite advanced today. One has to       remember that there is roughly a 7-10 day window between initial       HIV infection, and when the virus can be detected in blood.       According to the statistics, the probability of receiving an HIV-       positive blood donation is one in 1.5 million for U.S. patients.       The odds suggest our laboratories are doing a very fine job in       screening our blood supply.              I cannot tell you the scientific reasoning for the one-year ban       on sexual activity. This means that potential gay male donors       will be asked "Have you had sex with another man within the last       12 months?" To me, that year-long abstinence policy doesn't make       any sense. The FDA must explain the chosen time period, and       realize that gay couples who are in a stable, loving       relationship are not going to abstain from having sex with their       partner for an entire year just to be able to donate blood. The       policy is still stigmatizing the gay community and is       discriminatory, especially toward those who do not have any       other high-risk factors like drug abuse.              I think the more pertinent question that should be asked of a       potential donor should focus on the number of sexual partners       they have had over the past year, and whether or not they have       been tested for HIV within that same time period. If a donor has       been tested in the last 12 months, I believe it is fair to       document the results of that HIV test, that way you have       multiple risk factors identified. However, the general rule for       donors who are at a low-risk of HIV should be no more than a 30-       day period of abstinence.              As it stands now, this new policy will only serve to confuse the       American public, and I believe it was a hastily assembled plan       to change an outdated, 32-year-old policy, without really       addressing the issues. Unfortunately, this is typical of the FDA.              The FDA will begin taking comments on the new policy in the next       60 days, and I implore men and women of the scientific community       and those who are knowledgeable on this topic to weigh in. I am       encouraged by the change in policy, but I hope that the news is       not inflated without rational scientific facts behind it. Adding       confusion to the mix will further discourage people from       donating blood, or may even cause them to be afraid of receiving       a life-saving unit of donated blood when they really need it.              The post How FDA plan to lift ban on gay blood donations missed       the mark appeared first on AskDrManny.                     Follow Dr. Manny on Facebook and subscribe to his YouTube       channel for more.              Dr. Manny Alvarez serves as Fox News Channel's Senior Managing       Editor for Health News. Prior to this position, Alvarez was a       FNC medical contributor. Click here more information on Dr.       Manny's work with Hackensack University Medical Center. Visit       AskDrManny.com for more.              http://www.foxnews.com/health/2015/05/13/how-fda-plan-to-lift-       ban-on-gay-blood-donations-missed-mark/                             --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca