Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.disasters.aviation    |    Joey do you like movies about gladiators    |    31,131 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 29,158 of 31,131    |
|    Eeyore to Mxsmanic    |
|    Re: Primary training in a Hi Perf comple    |
|    26 Mar 07 02:35:51    |
      XPost: rec.aviation.piloting, alt.usenet.kooks       From: rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com              Mxsmanic wrote:              > Eeyore writes:       >       > > PPLs don't apply to such aircraft.       >       > Oh ... so you don't need a PPL to fly a 747?              How do you think you get the hours to progress to CPL ? You have to have a CPL       before       ATPL etc.... How about the night, multi-engine and instrument ratings ?                     > > Is that what you think ?       >       > When it comes to airliners, I am _certain_ of it.              But you're an idiot !                     > > In actual fact you may be right that's it's enirely possible but basic       piloting       > > skills are deemed an essential ingedient of the package.       >       > They are deemed essential by regulatory fiat, but in reality, they aren't       > essential at all. At least not the "skills" one learns in tin cans and other       > aircraft besides the target type of aircraft.              Those basic skills are what saves aircraft when things go wrong.                     > > It's not how it's done.       >       > Not in the USA. But it can be done. Apparently some places are doing it.        It       > makes economic sense.       >       > Anyway, I think it has been fairly well established here              Where ?                     > that you can do all your training in a high-performance aircraft, if you       wish.              What do you mean by high-performance ?                     > I don't see why that aircraft could not be a jet airliner, if the price is       right.       > Or is there some regulatory barrier to starting and finishing exclusively       in, say,       > a 737?              Yes.              For one thing you can't start by flying multi-engined aircraft. I suggest you       kill       the engine(s) on one side whilst simulating a landing for example.              Graham              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca