From: rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com   
      
   john bates wrote:   
      
   > The fact that some experienced people all mentioned the nose high attitude   
   > before a stall (Which was the case due to the very short distance it   
   > travelled on the grass)   
      
   If it had truly STALLED there would have been a far nastier mess. The pilot   
   was just 'stetching' the glide.   
      
      
   > why did it do this if under perfect control? This to   
   > me implies that it was not just the engines.   
      
   The engines didn't fail. There's clear evidence at least one was turning when   
   it landed. They 'failed' to respond to a call for power. That's where the   
   'failure' is and it looks likely to be electronic to me (or some bizarre fuel   
   quality related issue).   
      
   Graham   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)