95e63eb2   
   XPost: rec.aviation.military, alt.usenet.kooks, alt.alien.vampir   
   .flonk.flonk.flonk   
   XPost: alt.fan.karl-malden.nose, rec.aviation.piloting   
   From: Sm@rt.1   
      
   BradGuth  wrote in   
   news:b385177a-b6d9-4460-8ac4-17c097a7d0ff@e6g2000prf.googlegroups.com:   
      
   > On Jan 20, 6:10 pm, BradGuth  wrote:   
   >> On Jan 20, 1:48 am, Bertie the Bunyip  wrote:   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> > BradGuth  wrote in   
   >> > news:bf992a1c-4f53-4b31-8ae1-   
   >> > 1d0091154...@i7g2000prf.googlegroups.com:   
   >>   
   >> > > On Jan 19, 5:17 pm, Bertie the Bunyip  wrote:   
   >> > >> BradGuth  wrote in   
   >> > >> news:8c33ee00-634a-4d6d-96a3-   
   >> > >> 66b1e53d0...@e6g2000prf.googlegroups.com:   
   >>   
   >> > >> > Say, why don't we quote the entire Old Testament each and   
   >> > >> > every time?   
   >>   
   >> > >> Personally, I think you should.   
   >>   
   >> > >> > Perhaps if your brown-nosed tactics can accomplish a terabyte   
   >> > >> > of damage-control crapolla per reply, as such you silly   
   >> > >> > faith-based pretend atheist clowns could bring this   
   >> > >> > Google/NOVA served Usenet to its knees.   
   >>   
   >> > >> Vive la revolution!   
   >>   
   >> > > That's what I thought.  Sorry you can't honestly contribute as to   
   >> > > the topic at hand.   
   >>   
   >> > What topic is that?   
   >>   
   >> > Bertie   
   >>   
   >> Whatever happened to your original "Awesome moonscape" topic?   
   >>   
   >> Is there a little something you spooks and moles of MI5/CIA have to   
   >> say?   
   >>   
   >> Are you folks into hiding the original topic along with hiding those   
   >> WMD?   
   >> - Brad Guth   
   >   
   > That's odd, the Usenet lights went out with the last "Bertie the   
   > Bunyip" reply on top of the Google/NOVA Usenet stack.  Anyone got a   
   > reason for that?   
      
      
   Well, it's obvious, isn;t it?   
      
      
   >   
   > Our new and improved NASA, that for the past 8 years and counting as   
   > having ignored all things Venus, is about to fold once again before   
   > their own dumbfounded eyes of denial and evidence exclusion, in much   
   > the same as our old NASA/Apollo fiasco that for some odd reasons still   
   > can't be imaged from the best efforts of JAXA's Selene (KAGUYA) as   
   > offering its 3D imaging that's offering more than sufficient 10   
   > meters/ pixel resolution, as though our supposed "right stuff" is   
   > having to continually hide under most any available moon rock because,   
   > there's still nothing of any such bright and shiny Apollo technology   
   > residing upon that physically dark as coal moon of ours (unless an   
   > artificial crater counts).   
   >   
      
      
   You're a credit to your income bracket.   
      
      
   Bertie   
   >   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)