XPost: alt.usenet.kooks, alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, free.usenet   
   XPost: rec.aviation.military   
   From: Sm@rt.1   
      
   Aratzio  wrote in   
   news:hojsp39s5i9fadt6o78hliog323hfeggf8@4ax.com:   
      
   > On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 20:59:37 +0000 (UTC), in   
   > alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, Bertie the Bunyip    
   > bloviated:   
   >   
   >>Aratzio  wrote in   
   >>news:0nfsp3loh7kg4118gs2h0fu2q86b6m5uv4@4ax.com:   
   >>   
   >>> On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 20:33:04 +0000 (UTC), in   
   >>> alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, Bertie the Bunyip    
   >>> bloviated:   
   >>>   
   >>>>"Clive"  wrote in news:2yqnj.2464   
   >>$801.1877   
   >>>>@fe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> "Tex Houston"  wrote in message   
   >>>>> news:cN2dnSMB_a4gtwPanZ2dnUVZ_uCinZ2d@pcisys.net...   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> "Clive"  wrote in message   
   >>>>>> news:479dd35f$0$18483$9a6e19ea@unlimited.newshosting.com...   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> I lurk here...I can't fly, wish I could, know a couple   
   >>>>>>> of pilots and have a keen interest in aviation, particularly   
   >>>>>>> piston-engined fighters of any vintage, got the books, visit   
   >>>>>>> the airshows, static museum displays etc.   
   >>>>>>> I enjoy the posts by Rob and others, find the reminisces   
   >>>>>>> by others highly interesting etc.   
   >>>>>>> Then this bullshit with some idiot calling himself 'Bertie   
   >>>>>>> the Bunyip' fouls up the NG...silly little boys name calling.   
   >>>>>>> (Rob...just bloody ignore him)   
   >>>>>>> What really concerns me is that apparently this 'B-the-B'   
   >>>>>>> twat is a commercial pilot? Can this be true?   
   >>>>>>> Is this loony really flying over our heads in charge of an   
   >>>>>>> aircraft...possibly with passengers on board?   
   >>>>>>> Do his employers know he's nuts?   
   >>>>>>> I won't see any reply he might make to this post but   
   >>>>>>> would be interested in knowing the truth...so might they.   
   >>>>>>> -C-   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> --   
   >>>>>>> Clive P Norris   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> The bad part is that he has done this before.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Tex   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> So I see from various sources.   
   >>>>> He has got a history has he not?   
   >>>>> That's not normal behaviour despite what his little   
   >>>>> bum-buddy Arzholio thinks.   
   >>>>> I want the man driving my plane to be a pro   
   >>>>> through and through.   
   >>>>> This obsessive posting is not the sort of behaviour   
   >>>>> I would expect from any professional whether a pilot/doctor   
   >>>>> etc. (Politicians excepted)   
   >>>>> Kindly advise airline and routes flown so I can avoid.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>Well, could be a lot of places.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>Maybe even BA...   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>Bertie   
   >>>   
   >>> I kinda find it interesting that he lacks all qualification to   
   >>> determine fitness for flight.   
   >>   
   >>Yeah. Well people have strange ideas about what pilots are. Or people   
   in   
   >>any occupation, I suppose. Some sort of fit the "right stuff" image,   
   but   
   >>they aren't necessarily the best guys around. Basically anyone who   
   makes   
   >>it past all the checks we have to do, and then does it time and time   
   >>again for year after year 9 we do two sim check, two medicals and one   
   >>line ride a year) is competent at least, and usually more than that.   
   >>As far as mental health goes, Pilots have one of the worst track   
   records   
   >>going. Divorce, alchoholism ( Britsih pilots suffer from this more   
   than   
   >>most BTW, so Clive has a paper asshole in more ways than one) but   
   still   
   >>, this almost never affects the way we do our jobs. It's understood   
   that   
   >>fucking around in an airplane in motion is a bad idea and personal   
   >>problems, quirks, and miscellaneous idiocies are all left outside the   
   >>cockpit door.   
   >   
   > Same as working on medical equipment. Don't fuck around, people can   
   > die. Police, fire etc etc. The list is long of occupations where   
   > peoples lives depend upon your actions.   
   >   
   >   
   >>Me, I don't see a hobby of loonwhacking to be a big deal, m'self.   
   >>Asking some guys in the active piot's froups ( where i am relatively   
   >>well behaved) would give anyone interested a more objective view of my   
   >>knowledge and temperment.   
   >   
   > Anyone that can't detect what you are really doing is just plain   
   > stupid.   
   >   
      
   Well, exactly. HAving said that, of course, there are a lot of people   
   who can't tell!   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>>   
   >>> He should be a member of the Iraq Working Group and advise Shrub.   
   >>   
   >>Wel, he's British. Maybe he can be invovled in their next big   
   >>"compassionate invasion"   
   >>   
   >   
   > Maybe Gordon can appoint him chancellor of the loons.   
   >   
      
   He he.   
      
   I wonder if the monster raving looney party has survived the death of   
   it;s founder? I havent heard anything about them in years.   
      
      
   Bertie   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)