XPost: alt.usenet.kooks, rec.aviation.piloting, alt.alien.vampir
.flonk.flonk.flonk
From: AA@AA.AA
debco99@nt.org (DaveB) wrote in news:484b31b1.10455013
@news.dslextreme.com:
> On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 23:51:40 +0000 (UTC), Bertie the Bunyip
> wrote:
>
>>Le Chaud Lapin wrote in news:ed9fb806-990a-
4a04-
>>8ac9-d7318d2c8bdf@d77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com:
>>
>>> On Jun 7, 3:57 pm, Larry Dighera wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 10:10:13 -0700 (PDT), Le Chaud Lapin
>>>> wrote in
>>>> <61c1a6af-039c-4061-8d8a-97de48696...
@r66g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>:
>>>>
>>>> >On Jun 7, 12:02 pm, Larry Dighera wrote:
>>>> >> On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 07:57:57 -0700 (PDT), Le Chaud Lapin
>>>> >> wrote in
>>>> >> >"Step 38...when flying $1.4 billion aircraft and computer warns
>>you
>>>> >> >that something is wrong, listen to it."
>>>>
>>>> >> What you suggest that the pilots may have done as a result of
that
>>>> >> computer warning?
>>>>
>>>> >Abort takeoff?
>>>>
>>>> Is that the appropriate response when the computer issues that
>>warning
>>>> message?
>>>>
>>>> It appears that they were just about to leave the runway when the
>>>> computer issued that warning.
>>>>
>>>> Did adequate runway remain to abort the takeoff ?
>>>
>>> Hmm...that's a good question. Not being a pilot, I cannot say, but
>>> from the video, the firestreak of the crash looks extremely long,
even
>>> for a 300,000lb+ aircraft. Also, it stated that IAS of 120mph was,
in
>>> fact, much less, so conservatively, we could say 110mph.
>>>
>>> Not sure if that is slow enough, but again, that runway looks very
>>> long.
>>>
>>
>>
>>You have no idea what you're talking about. You're certainly not
>>qualified to comment on the decisions made by a B2 crew.
>>
>>
>>
>>Bertie
>>
>>
>>
>>Bertie
>>
> and I suppose you are?
> Daveb
>
Nope. Never flew one. I know enough to know he's not qualified to say
why Mary Jane fell off her tricycle, though.
Bertie
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
