XPost: sci.military.naval, sci.space.shuttle, alt.conspiracy   
   XPost: sci.astro.amateur   
   From: jwarner@mchsi.com   
      
   "Dean A. Markley" wrote:   
      
   > OM wrote:   
   > > ...As the guy who organized and compiled the Columbia Loss FAQ back   
   > > when we lost Columbia and her crew, I've only two things to say about   
   > > this HAARP claim:   
   > >   
   > > 1) It's complete and utter bullshit, because HAARP wasn't even up and   
   > > running when Columbia reentered, much less while it was in orbit. This   
   > > has been documented, and don't try to claim it was covered-up. The   
   > > only thing "covered up" is your CT Nutter prattle, because it's   
   > > covered in bullshit three feet higher than the storm surge that's   
   > > hitting Galveston right about now.   
   > >   
   > > 2) People who perpetrate these hoax claims are total scum, and need to   
   > > be taken out to a field somewhere, beaten repeatedly until they're   
   > > sufficiently broken, and then tossed into a pit where they can rot to   
   > > death. That's the most deserving fate scum like the ones pushing this   
   > > HAARP claim can receive for masturbating their fragile egos at the   
   > > expense of the memories of seven fallen heroes.   
   > >   
   > > ...As for whether or not I'd actually be involved in 2), the question   
   > > is whether I'd be willing to settle just for holding the scumbag while   
   > > someone else beats the shit out of them, instead of me delivering the   
   > > pain with a baseball bat or a tire iron.   
   > >   
   > >                               OM   
   > Not that I disagree with you but posting under such a name doesn't help   
   > your case.   
      
   Would "Palinovsky" be better?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)