XPost: rec.aviation.piloting, alt.usenet.kooks, rec.arts.poetry   
   XPost: alt.religion.asatru, alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, nz.general   
   XPost: alt.bass   
   From: AA@AA.AA   
      
   "Mick" <@_#`~#@.^net> wrote in news:PjzAk.9125$PS3.1317@newsfe06.iad:   
      
   >   
   > "Bertie the Bunyip"  wrote in message   
   > news:Xns9B1C14B60510Dpissupropeeh@208.90.168.18...   
   >> "Peter Dohm"  wrote in news:csYzk.30660   
   $kh2.574   
   >> @bignews3.bellsouth.net:   
   >>   
   >>> "Bertie the Bunyip"  wrote in message   
   >>> news:Xns9B1CABA31A93pissupropeeh@208.90.168.18...   
   >>>> "Peter Dohm"  wrote in   
   >>>> news:dzXzk.30638$kh2.123@bignews3.bellsouth.net:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> "JGalban via AviationKB.com"  wrote in message   
   >>>>> news:8a4950eac1beb@uwe...   
   >>>>>> Peter Dohm wrote:   
   >>>>>>>The only difference that would make nitrogen seen really   
   beneficial   
   >>>>>>>to me would be in the case of an aircraft which is kept hangared   
   >> and   
   >>>>>>>seldom operated.  Then, if the tire threads last a number of   
   years,   
   >>>>>>>and the tires are sheltered from UV radiation, the inert nature   
   of   
   >>>>>>>the nitrogen could be usefull.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>  In theory, perhaps.  In practice, tires oxidize from the outside   
   >> as   
   >>>>>>  well   
   >>>>>> as   
   >>>>>> the inside. I've noticed that every time I've bought expensive,   
   >>>>>> long-life tires, they have to be chucked because the sidewalls   
   are   
   >>>>>> rotting, even though   
   >>>>>> the tread is still good.  It's not just air, but pollutants   
   >>>>>> (particularly in   
   >>>>>> the cities).  Ozone, a common urban pollutant, is particularly   
   bad   
   >>>>>> for tires.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> John Galban=====>N4BQ (PA28-180)   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>> Ordinarily, I would just let this slide; but since the greenies   
   have   
   >>>>> decided that CO2 (which is nature's means of recycling oxygen) and   
   >> O3   
   >>>>> (which is nature's cleanser of the atmosphere) are "pollutants"   
   >>>>> according to the strange reasoning of their adled brains,   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Here is an explanation for you.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> If you find it too difficult to understand I'll have a look around   
   >> for   
   >>>> the Litle Golden Book of Wonder version for you.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> http://earthguide.ucsd.edu/globalchange/global_warming/03.html   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Bertie   
   >>>   
   >>> You are too kind!   
   >>>   
   >>> BTW, it did make a good case for the expansion of nuclear power--   
   which   
   >> I   
   >>> have long favored.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> No, it didn't.   
   >>   
   >> Maybe if I find something with pictures for you.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> Bertie   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >   
   > You're a cross posting dumb ass.   
   >   
   >   
   >   
      
   Shooting for another AUP violation fjukkkwit?   
      
   Bertie   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)