XPost: rec.aviation.piloting, alt.usenet.kooks, rec.arts.poems
From: BtB@BB.not.aaaaaaa
"Maxwell" <#$$9#@%%%.^^^> wrote in news:GKocl.29953$H12.6282
@newsfe12.iad:
>
> "Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message
> news:Xns9B965D1D56D4Cpissupropeeh@208.90.168.18...
>> Stealth Pilot wrote in
>> news:vmnom4hnro9celg3o6i1uoq4ktsb33260g@4ax.com:
>>
>>> On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 02:20:32 +0000 (UTC), Bertie the Bunyip
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Stealth Pilot wrote in
>>>>news:v8jmm4do9b51ch1os18m33lc9k65vl8c1j@4ax.com:
>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, 12 Jan 2009 13:17:32 +0000, Flydive
>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Stealth Pilot wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> well it is the case. do the calcs yourself on a whizwheel.
>>>>>>> 250 knots and a worst case of 10 knots from the side.
>>>>>>> remember that the calcs are for fuel burn and range the actual
>> flying
>>>>>>> being done with instrument assistance.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>You kidding right?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>At cruise levels you routinely see winds of 50, 100, or more
knots.
>>>>>>Cruise at 450 kts and factor a head wind of 100 kts and you'll see
>> it
>>>>>>makes a big difference on range.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>For t/o winds and temperature are always taken into account, again
>> can
>>>>>>make a big difference on load you can carry.
>>>>>
>>>>> no I'm not kidding. I'm referring to Pilatus PC9's in training
>> roles.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Yes, so? th eOP was talking about an airliner
>>>>
>>>>Bertie
>>>
>>> no. he was relating a comment made by a pilot which he thought was a
>>> flick off. I dont think it was.
>>
>>
>> Nope,
>>>
>>> ....havent we all got something better to do?
>>
>>
>> Not at the moment!
>> Standby..
>>
>> Bertie
>
> You never will!!!
>
>
Not as long as you're here, fjukktard.
Bertie
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
