XPost: rec.aviation.piloting, alt.usenet.kooks   
   From: BtB@BB.not.aaaaaaa   
      
   Eeyore  wrote in   
   news:497E5D66.28B6045@hotmail.com:   
      
   >   
   >   
   > Bertie the Bunyip wrote:   
   >   
   >> spope33@speedymail.org (Steve Pope) wrote> vaughn   
   >>  wrote:   
   >> >   
   >> >> The absence of immediate evidence to the contrary does not   
   >> >> in any way make "some design flaw or maintenance issue of the   
   >> >> other engine" likely.  It is possible I suppose, but not likely.   
   >> >> Remember, "conventional wisdom" is sometimes spectacularly wrong,   
   >> >> but it is dangerous to bet against it.   
   >> >   
   >> > Sure, although I'm not sure "conventional wisdom" states that   
   >> > each engine ingesting a bird simultaneously is all that likely   
   >> > either.   
   >>   
   >> Yeah it is actualy.   
   >   
   > Statistically it is simply the square of a single bird strike. Probably   
   > plus some other factors to make it more likely because birds often fly   
   > in flocks.   
   >   
   > Graham   
   >   
   > Now Bertei is removing groups !     
   >   
      
   Netkkkoping fjukktard.   
      
      
   Bertie   
   >   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)