XPost: rec.aviation.piloting, alt.usenet.kooks   
   From: #$$9#@%%%.^^^   
      
   "Bertie the Bunyip"  wrote in message   
   news:glm2bt$q3h$2@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...   
   > Eeyore  wrote in   
   > news:497E5D66.28B6045@hotmail.com:   
   >   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> Bertie the Bunyip wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> spope33@speedymail.org (Steve Pope) wrote> vaughn   
   >>>  wrote:   
   >>> >   
   >>> >> The absence of immediate evidence to the contrary does not   
   >>> >> in any way make "some design flaw or maintenance issue of the   
   >>> >> other engine" likely.  It is possible I suppose, but not likely.   
   >>> >> Remember, "conventional wisdom" is sometimes spectacularly wrong,   
   >>> >> but it is dangerous to bet against it.   
   >>> >   
   >>> > Sure, although I'm not sure "conventional wisdom" states that   
   >>> > each engine ingesting a bird simultaneously is all that likely   
   >>> > either.   
   >>>   
   >>> Yeah it is actualy.   
   >>   
   >> Statistically it is simply the square of a single bird strike. Probably   
   >> plus some other factors to make it more likely because birds often fly   
   >> in flocks.   
   >>   
   >> Graham   
   >>   
   >> Now Bertei is removing groups !     
   >>   
   >   
   > Netkkkoping fjukktard.   
   >   
   >   
   > Bertie   
   >>   
   >   
      
   Wanna be retard.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)