XPost: rec.aviation.piloting, alt.usenet.kooks   
   From: BtB@BB.not.aaaaaaa   
      
   "Maxwell" <#$$9#@%%%.^^^> wrote in news:Rv%fl.9712$8O.1677@newsfe06.iad:   
      
   >   
   > "Bertie the Bunyip"  wrote in message   
   > news:glm2bt$q3h$2@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...   
   >> Eeyore  wrote in   
   >> news:497E5D66.28B6045@hotmail.com:   
   >>   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>> Bertie the Bunyip wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> spope33@speedymail.org (Steve Pope) wrote> vaughn   
   >>>>  wrote:   
   >>>> >   
   >>>> >> The absence of immediate evidence to the contrary does not   
   >>>> >> in any way make "some design flaw or maintenance issue of the   
   >>>> >> other engine" likely.  It is possible I suppose, but not likely.   
   >>>> >> Remember, "conventional wisdom" is sometimes spectacularly   
   wrong,   
   >>>> >> but it is dangerous to bet against it.   
   >>>> >   
   >>>> > Sure, although I'm not sure "conventional wisdom" states that   
   >>>> > each engine ingesting a bird simultaneously is all that likely   
   >>>> > either.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Yeah it is actualy.   
   >>>   
   >>> Statistically it is simply the square of a single bird strike.   
   Probably   
   >>> plus some other factors to make it more likely because birds often   
   fly   
   >>> in flocks.   
   >>>   
   >>> Graham   
   >>>   
   >>> Now Bertei is removing groups !     
   >>>   
   >>   
   >> Netkkkoping fjukktard.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> Bertie   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >   
   > Wanna be retard.   
      
      
   Guide me oh master.   
      
   Bertie   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)