XPost: rec.aviation.piloting, alt.usenet.kooks, rec.arts.poems
XPost: alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, alt.aratzio, comp.os.os2.advocacy
From: BtB@BB.not.aaaaaaa
"Maxwell" <#$$9#@%%%.^^^> wrote in news:Z20gl.24624$1W7.1614
@newsfe11.iad:
>
> "Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message
> news:glm4ks$4o6$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
>> "Orsen Wells w/Citizen Cain" wrote in
news:4da06
>> $497d385d$a6666851$25913@ALLTEL.NET:
>>
>>>
>>> "Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message
>>> news:gljcf5$mr8$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
>>>> spope33@speedymail.org (Steve Pope) wrote in news:glj9o8$5mp$3
>>>> @blue.rahul.net:
>>>>
>>>>> vaughn wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> The absence of immediate evidence to the contrary does not
>>>>>> in any way make "some design flaw or maintenance issue of the
>>>>>> other engine" likely. It is possible I suppose, but not likely.
>>>>>> Remember, "conventional wisdom" is sometimes spectacularly wrong,
>>>>>> but it is dangerous to bet against it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sure, although I'm not sure "conventional wisdom" states that
>>>>> each engine ingesting a bird simultaneously is all that likely
>>>>> either.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yea,h it is actualy.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm not sure if you expect bird remains in an engine that lay at
>>>>> the bottom of the Hudson for a week, but there should be
>>>>> blade damage consistent with sucking a bird if the double-bird
>>>>> theory is correct.
>>>>
>>>> not neccesarily.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Bertie
>>>
>>> MAYBE THE GOVERNMENT DID IT LIKE THEY DID 9-11
>>>
>>
>> And why shouldn't they? If they can't do it who could? Smersh?
>>
>> bertie
>
> Don't you just love to perpetuate bullshit on the pilot group.
>
Keeping you alive here is what I live for.
( what are the odds he'll get that? Anyone care to hazard a guess? )
Bertie
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
