Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.disasters    |    Mother nature is on the rag again    |    562 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 73 of 562    |
|    Terryc to Harbin Osteen    |
|    Re: Safest Places in the US?    |
|    12 Oct 06 00:11:20    |
      etworks.com.au> a6f6cd92       XPost: alt.building.construction, alt.trades.construction.us, alt.survival       XPost: alt.construction, alt.talk.weather, rec.travel.usa-canada       From: newsonespam-spam@woa.com.au              Harbin Osteen wrote:              > Hi Terryc:       > Your probably right for a structure that is compleatly underground, but       > a berm house is only half under ground level, and will have a weaker       > interface for the transfer of shear forces, but I need to do more research       > on this to see how big of a problem this is.              I suspect a house that consists of individual segments (thick walled       cyclinders?) might might have a better chance of having maximum parts       survive. Might need to re-dig/rebuild a few connecting tunels.              I guess it will depend on your soil strata and water content for a berm       house.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca