XPost: alt.sex.stories.d, alt.bad.clams, soc.men
XPost: alt.usenet.kooks
From: fkhall@gmail.com
On 10 Mar 2006 08:02:16 -0800, christopherkidwell3@comcast.net wrote:
>
>Fred Hall wrote:
>> On 9 Mar 2006 17:28:12 -0800, "Evil Fantasies"
>> wrote:
>>
>> >No, I don't have any stories up yet. Yes, I've been busy. Deal with it.
>> >LOL
>> >
>> >And now, my own little special ass-chewing for "Wrong Said Fred":
>> >
>> >Hiya Freddy,
>> >
>> >Sooooo... you're here to dictate the thoughts and words of others, hmm?
>> > I really have to wonder why you're wasting your time posting these
>> >cunt-rants about stories which, let's face it, you wouldn't even be
>> >aware of, if you were not purposely seeking them out. Just WHAT are
>> >you doing here? Aren't guys like you usually out roasting weenies at
>> >the local book-burning rally for conservative tight-asses??? You know,
>> >thus far, every single post you have made to this group has been
>> >nothing more than a complete and utter display of hypocritical
>> >ignorance. In one keystroke, you condemn pedophiliac literature on the
>> >basis of indecency; in the next, you divulge that you have no problem
>> >with stories which describe *ANY* type of obscene behavior between
>> >adults. Hmmm... therefore, this must mean that you condone, and are an
>> >advocate of:
>> >
>> >*Rape
>> >*Murder
>> >*Necrophilia
>> >*Torture
>> >*Castration
>> >*Scat
>> >And the list goes on....
>> >
>> >In fact, you even went so far as to state your approval of sexual acts
>> >between humans and animals. Now, this is just my humble opinion, but,
>> >do you honestly believe that a man like yourself.... a man who, in one
>> >particular post, gave the proverbial green-light to bestiality
>> >aficionados worldwide that it's quote "ok with me, if they want to suck
>> >a dog's dick", is actually constructed of the highest moral fiber and
>> >is thereby an appropriate judge of right and wrong, as it pertains to
>> >sexuality??? Excuse me while I.......
>> >
>> >LMFAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!
>> >
>> >So, it's only ok for one to author a story about taking advantage of
>> >helpless animals??? Nice. Yes, your beautiful, pure & decent sole was
>> >TRULY casting it's radiance over the shadowy depths of PedPerv Land
>> >when you made THAT statement. We better watch our asses!!! Were in
>> >the presence of the second incarnation of Jesus Fucking Christ!
>> >
>> >I think there are a few things that a self-righteous DUNCE like
>> >yourself needs to be aware of:
>> >
>> >A. Words DO NOT = Action. A human thought is not a crime, unless acted
>> >upon. If this were not the case, I would be incarcerated at this very
>> >moment ... for the murder of over 2,000 people.
>> >
>> >B. The law states that everyone is a child until the age of 18. Are
>> >you saying that you have NEVER had even ONE naughty thought about a
>> >girl/boy/whatever who has not yet reached this age?
>> >
>> >C. Just because you don't approve of something somebody says, that
>> >doesn't give you the right to prohibit their Freedom of Speech. You
>> >have the right to state your disdain ... nothing more. So, you really
>> >need to stop popping off idle threats about getting authors sent up the
>> >river, based on the content of their FICTIONAL (do you know what that
>> >word means?) stories.
>> >
>> >D. More often than not, the biggest perverts are the very ones who run
>> >around playing the Saint/Savior role, and other sexually repressed
>> >squarepants personas. Yes, this means *YOU*. I know the type. You
>> >tiptoe to the comp while your wife sleeps, and quickly find yourself at
>> >the "Cherry-poppin Chicks With Dicks" homepage. The next 20 seconds of
>> >your pathetic life are spent bopping your bologna to some piss-poor
>> >quality MPEG of a 15 year old getting anally reemed-out by an obese
>> >tranny. Of course, after you spill your seed, the guilt sets in....
>> >AND NOW you must find a way to redeem yourself by making others feel
>> >inferior for their own carnal desires. What a limp-wristed titmouse
>> >you are.
>> >
>> >Ok, I think I've made my point here, but, I have one last thing to add.
>> > You know, I've had a particular story idea in my mind for some time
>> >now ... well, I have a lot of ideas, but not a lot of time to pen them
>> >... but anyhow, it's one of those "horny teen girl seduces hot older
>> >guy" themes. I'm 30, but I assure you that when I was a teenager, I
>> >entertained sexual thoughts about MEN, not boys, but MEN, who were at
>> >least twice my age. Now, are you gonna sit there and tell me that, if
>> >I find the time to compose said story and post it here, I am in
>> >violation of some imaginary law that prohibits me from expressing those
>> >feelings? Will I then be classified as a certified sicko, according to
>> >you? Oh, and allow me to pose another question:
>> >
>> >You're sifting through the contents of ASSD with a fine-toothed NetKop
>> >comb, as usual. Two stories with questionable content have been
>> >posted. You read them both. One is of a rape/snuff flavor, about a
>> >homicidal maniac who abducts ADULT females, (cause we all know Freddy
>> >says it's ok to abuse adults *wink*) rapes them repeatedly, burns them
>> >with cigarettes, and finally strangles them with their very own
>> >pantyhose. The second story depicts a consensual & mutually satisfying
>> >sexual relationship (God forbid the act of giving pleasure. We all know
>> >how EVIL that is. *smirk*) between a 16 year old girl and a 40 year old
>> >guy.
>> >
>> >The question is, which story do YOU find to be the most offensive
>> >and/or morally corrupt? If you choose the latter ... well.... I'm
>> >afraid all of your finger-pointing & criticism should be directed at
>> >your own image in the bathroom mirror.
>>
>> Beautiful meltdown, kook.
>
>Beautiful truth, more like it.
Why did you pimp your underage daughters out to adults, crissie?
Didn't you know that's illegal?
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
