XPost: alt.sex.stories.d, alt.bad.clams, soc.men
XPost: alt.usenet.kooks
From: jade@net-kooks.org
On Fri, 10 Mar 2006 12:24:50 -0600, Fred Hall
wrote:
>On Fri, 10 Mar 2006 08:15:51 -0500, Daedalus
>wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 09 Mar 2006 20:02:54 -0600, Fred Hall
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On 9 Mar 2006 17:28:12 -0800, "Evil Fantasies"
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>No, I don't have any stories up yet. Yes, I've been busy. Deal with it.
>>>>LOL
>>>>
>>>>And now, my own little special ass-chewing for "Wrong Said Fred":
>>>>
>>>>Hiya Freddy,
>>>>
>>>>Sooooo... you're here to dictate the thoughts and words of others, hmm?
>>>> I really have to wonder why you're wasting your time posting these
>>>>cunt-rants about stories which, let's face it, you wouldn't even be
>>>>aware of, if you were not purposely seeking them out. Just WHAT are
>>>>you doing here? Aren't guys like you usually out roasting weenies at
>>>>the local book-burning rally for conservative tight-asses??? You know,
>>>>thus far, every single post you have made to this group has been
>>>>nothing more than a complete and utter display of hypocritical
>>>>ignorance. In one keystroke, you condemn pedophiliac literature on the
>>>>basis of indecency; in the next, you divulge that you have no problem
>>>>with stories which describe *ANY* type of obscene behavior between
>>>>adults. Hmmm... therefore, this must mean that you condone, and are an
>>>>advocate of:
>>>>
>>>>*Rape
>>>>*Murder
>>>>*Necrophilia
>>>>*Torture
>>>>*Castration
>>>>*Scat
>>>>And the list goes on....
>>>>
>>>>In fact, you even went so far as to state your approval of sexual acts
>>>>between humans and animals. Now, this is just my humble opinion, but,
>>>>do you honestly believe that a man like yourself.... a man who, in one
>>>>particular post, gave the proverbial green-light to bestiality
>>>>aficionados worldwide that it's quote "ok with me, if they want to suck
>>>>a dog's dick", is actually constructed of the highest moral fiber and
>>>>is thereby an appropriate judge of right and wrong, as it pertains to
>>>>sexuality??? Excuse me while I.......
>>>>
>>>>LMFAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!
>>>>
>>>>So, it's only ok for one to author a story about taking advantage of
>>>>helpless animals??? Nice. Yes, your beautiful, pure & decent sole was
>>>>TRULY casting it's radiance over the shadowy depths of PedPerv Land
>>>>when you made THAT statement. We better watch our asses!!! Were in
>>>>the presence of the second incarnation of Jesus Fucking Christ!
>>>>
>>>>I think there are a few things that a self-righteous DUNCE like
>>>>yourself needs to be aware of:
>>>>
>>>>A. Words DO NOT = Action. A human thought is not a crime, unless acted
>>>>upon. If this were not the case, I would be incarcerated at this very
>>>>moment ... for the murder of over 2,000 people.
>>>>
>>>>B. The law states that everyone is a child until the age of 18. Are
>>>>you saying that you have NEVER had even ONE naughty thought about a
>>>>girl/boy/whatever who has not yet reached this age?
>>>>
>>>>C. Just because you don't approve of something somebody says, that
>>>>doesn't give you the right to prohibit their Freedom of Speech. You
>>>>have the right to state your disdain ... nothing more. So, you really
>>>>need to stop popping off idle threats about getting authors sent up the
>>>>river, based on the content of their FICTIONAL (do you know what that
>>>>word means?) stories.
>>>>
>>>>D. More often than not, the biggest perverts are the very ones who run
>>>>around playing the Saint/Savior role, and other sexually repressed
>>>>squarepants personas. Yes, this means *YOU*. I know the type. You
>>>>tiptoe to the comp while your wife sleeps, and quickly find yourself at
>>>>the "Cherry-poppin Chicks With Dicks" homepage. The next 20 seconds of
>>>>your pathetic life are spent bopping your bologna to some piss-poor
>>>>quality MPEG of a 15 year old getting anally reemed-out by an obese
>>>>tranny. Of course, after you spill your seed, the guilt sets in....
>>>>AND NOW you must find a way to redeem yourself by making others feel
>>>>inferior for their own carnal desires. What a limp-wristed titmouse
>>>>you are.
>>>>
>>>>Ok, I think I've made my point here, but, I have one last thing to add.
>>>> You know, I've had a particular story idea in my mind for some time
>>>>now ... well, I have a lot of ideas, but not a lot of time to pen them
>>>>... but anyhow, it's one of those "horny teen girl seduces hot older
>>>>guy" themes. I'm 30, but I assure you that when I was a teenager, I
>>>>entertained sexual thoughts about MEN, not boys, but MEN, who were at
>>>>least twice my age. Now, are you gonna sit there and tell me that, if
>>>>I find the time to compose said story and post it here, I am in
>>>>violation of some imaginary law that prohibits me from expressing those
>>>>feelings? Will I then be classified as a certified sicko, according to
>>>>you? Oh, and allow me to pose another question:
>>>>
>>>>You're sifting through the contents of ASSD with a fine-toothed NetKop
>>>>comb, as usual. Two stories with questionable content have been
>>>>posted. You read them both. One is of a rape/snuff flavor, about a
>>>>homicidal maniac who abducts ADULT females, (cause we all know Freddy
>>>>says it's ok to abuse adults *wink*) rapes them repeatedly, burns them
>>>>with cigarettes, and finally strangles them with their very own
>>>>pantyhose. The second story depicts a consensual & mutually satisfying
>>>>sexual relationship (God forbid the act of giving pleasure. We all know
>>>>how EVIL that is. *smirk*) between a 16 year old girl and a 40 year old
>>>>guy.
>>>>
>>>>The question is, which story do YOU find to be the most offensive
>>>>and/or morally corrupt? If you choose the latter ... well.... I'm
>>>>afraid all of your finger-pointing & criticism should be directed at
>>>>your own image in the bathroom mirror.
>>>
>>>Beautiful meltdown, kook.
>>
>>*applause from another froup*
>
>She really got wound up, didn't she? I believe you two are
>acquainted. She used to post in amm-j as Smegma2005, or something
>like that.
Oh, not that prattling trollop!
Jade
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
