XPost: alt.sex.stories.d, alt.bad.clams, soc.men
XPost: alt.usenet.kooks
From: fkhall@gmail.com
On Fri, 10 Mar 2006 13:30:58 -0500, Daedalus
wrote:
>On Fri, 10 Mar 2006 12:24:50 -0600, Fred Hall
>wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 10 Mar 2006 08:15:51 -0500, Daedalus
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 09 Mar 2006 20:02:54 -0600, Fred Hall
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>On 9 Mar 2006 17:28:12 -0800, "Evil Fantasies"
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>No, I don't have any stories up yet. Yes, I've been busy. Deal with it.
>>>>>LOL
>>>>>
>>>>>And now, my own little special ass-chewing for "Wrong Said Fred":
>>>>>
>>>>>Hiya Freddy,
>>>>>
>>>>>Sooooo... you're here to dictate the thoughts and words of others, hmm?
>>>>> I really have to wonder why you're wasting your time posting these
>>>>>cunt-rants about stories which, let's face it, you wouldn't even be
>>>>>aware of, if you were not purposely seeking them out. Just WHAT are
>>>>>you doing here? Aren't guys like you usually out roasting weenies at
>>>>>the local book-burning rally for conservative tight-asses??? You know,
>>>>>thus far, every single post you have made to this group has been
>>>>>nothing more than a complete and utter display of hypocritical
>>>>>ignorance. In one keystroke, you condemn pedophiliac literature on the
>>>>>basis of indecency; in the next, you divulge that you have no problem
>>>>>with stories which describe *ANY* type of obscene behavior between
>>>>>adults. Hmmm... therefore, this must mean that you condone, and are an
>>>>>advocate of:
>>>>>
>>>>>*Rape
>>>>>*Murder
>>>>>*Necrophilia
>>>>>*Torture
>>>>>*Castration
>>>>>*Scat
>>>>>And the list goes on....
>>>>>
>>>>>In fact, you even went so far as to state your approval of sexual acts
>>>>>between humans and animals. Now, this is just my humble opinion, but,
>>>>>do you honestly believe that a man like yourself.... a man who, in one
>>>>>particular post, gave the proverbial green-light to bestiality
>>>>>aficionados worldwide that it's quote "ok with me, if they want to suck
>>>>>a dog's dick", is actually constructed of the highest moral fiber and
>>>>>is thereby an appropriate judge of right and wrong, as it pertains to
>>>>>sexuality??? Excuse me while I.......
>>>>>
>>>>>LMFAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!
>>>>>
>>>>>So, it's only ok for one to author a story about taking advantage of
>>>>>helpless animals??? Nice. Yes, your beautiful, pure & decent sole was
>>>>>TRULY casting it's radiance over the shadowy depths of PedPerv Land
>>>>>when you made THAT statement. We better watch our asses!!! Were in
>>>>>the presence of the second incarnation of Jesus Fucking Christ!
>>>>>
>>>>>I think there are a few things that a self-righteous DUNCE like
>>>>>yourself needs to be aware of:
>>>>>
>>>>>A. Words DO NOT = Action. A human thought is not a crime, unless acted
>>>>>upon. If this were not the case, I would be incarcerated at this very
>>>>>moment ... for the murder of over 2,000 people.
>>>>>
>>>>>B. The law states that everyone is a child until the age of 18. Are
>>>>>you saying that you have NEVER had even ONE naughty thought about a
>>>>>girl/boy/whatever who has not yet reached this age?
>>>>>
>>>>>C. Just because you don't approve of something somebody says, that
>>>>>doesn't give you the right to prohibit their Freedom of Speech. You
>>>>>have the right to state your disdain ... nothing more. So, you really
>>>>>need to stop popping off idle threats about getting authors sent up the
>>>>>river, based on the content of their FICTIONAL (do you know what that
>>>>>word means?) stories.
>>>>>
>>>>>D. More often than not, the biggest perverts are the very ones who run
>>>>>around playing the Saint/Savior role, and other sexually repressed
>>>>>squarepants personas. Yes, this means *YOU*. I know the type. You
>>>>>tiptoe to the comp while your wife sleeps, and quickly find yourself at
>>>>>the "Cherry-poppin Chicks With Dicks" homepage. The next 20 seconds of
>>>>>your pathetic life are spent bopping your bologna to some piss-poor
>>>>>quality MPEG of a 15 year old getting anally reemed-out by an obese
>>>>>tranny. Of course, after you spill your seed, the guilt sets in....
>>>>>AND NOW you must find a way to redeem yourself by making others feel
>>>>>inferior for their own carnal desires. What a limp-wristed titmouse
>>>>>you are.
>>>>>
>>>>>Ok, I think I've made my point here, but, I have one last thing to add.
>>>>> You know, I've had a particular story idea in my mind for some time
>>>>>now ... well, I have a lot of ideas, but not a lot of time to pen them
>>>>>... but anyhow, it's one of those "horny teen girl seduces hot older
>>>>>guy" themes. I'm 30, but I assure you that when I was a teenager, I
>>>>>entertained sexual thoughts about MEN, not boys, but MEN, who were at
>>>>>least twice my age. Now, are you gonna sit there and tell me that, if
>>>>>I find the time to compose said story and post it here, I am in
>>>>>violation of some imaginary law that prohibits me from expressing those
>>>>>feelings? Will I then be classified as a certified sicko, according to
>>>>>you? Oh, and allow me to pose another question:
>>>>>
>>>>>You're sifting through the contents of ASSD with a fine-toothed NetKop
>>>>>comb, as usual. Two stories with questionable content have been
>>>>>posted. You read them both. One is of a rape/snuff flavor, about a
>>>>>homicidal maniac who abducts ADULT females, (cause we all know Freddy
>>>>>says it's ok to abuse adults *wink*) rapes them repeatedly, burns them
>>>>>with cigarettes, and finally strangles them with their very own
>>>>>pantyhose. The second story depicts a consensual & mutually satisfying
>>>>>sexual relationship (God forbid the act of giving pleasure. We all know
>>>>>how EVIL that is. *smirk*) between a 16 year old girl and a 40 year old
>>>>>guy.
>>>>>
>>>>>The question is, which story do YOU find to be the most offensive
>>>>>and/or morally corrupt? If you choose the latter ... well.... I'm
>>>>>afraid all of your finger-pointing & criticism should be directed at
>>>>>your own image in the bathroom mirror.
>>>>
>>>>Beautiful meltdown, kook.
>>>
>>>*applause from another froup*
>>
>>She really got wound up, didn't she? I believe you two are
>>acquainted. She used to post in amm-j as Smegma2005, or something
>>like that.
>
>Oh, not that prattling trollop!
The very one!
>
>Jade
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
