XPost: alt.support.girl-lovers, alt.troll, alt.hackers.malicious   
   From: teandson@hotmail.com   
      
   On 27 Mar 2006 19:11:27 -0800, christopherkidwell3@comcast.net wrote:   
      
   >   
   >bobandcarole wrote:   
   >> christopherkidwell3@comcast.net wrote:   
   >> > That is EXACTLY what it is, the appearance of safety.   
   >> > Any reasonably smart crook would be able to get ahold of the technology   
   >> > that is used to code RFID chips and make another one with the   
   >> > information on it being DIFFERENT than the information on the real   
   >> > RFID.   
   >> >   
   >> > Or, someone who is NOT on the sex offender registry will make a chip   
   >> > with the identity of someone ON the sex offender registry, and the   
   >> > police will go after the person whose information is being transmitted   
   >> > from the chip, NOT the real sex offender.   
   >>   
   >> And if you click your heels 3 times and say 'there's no -place like   
   >> home', Lord Vader will switch your chip for free........   
   >   
   >Uh, bobandcarole, go to the website of the people that offer these   
   >chips. They are the same ones that are used in dogs and cats in order   
   >to return them to their owners should they run away.   
   >   
   >There have been MANY documented cases of the chips being switched, so   
   >they are NOT foolproof. Anyone who read a surgical book for 5 SECONDS   
   >and was able to get ahold of a scalpel and some common surgical   
   >materials like gauze, painkillers, and other things, could remove and   
   >replace one of these RFID's.   
   >They could also pay a non-licensed surgeon to do the same thing!   
   >   
   >RFID's are a waste of money, putting pedophiles in jail forever is a   
   >waste of money, and killing them is a waste, because YOU will end up in   
   >jail.   
      
   Not me, But you never know who's dropping by for a visit.   
   >   
   >Get used to the fact that we are here, and we are NOT going away,   
   >repeal the stupid 'sexual abuse' and statutory rape laws and start   
   >teaching children "No one has the right to touch you against your will   
   >anywhere on your body, not even your parents and authority figures, but   
   >you also have the right to GIVE permission for people to touch your   
   >bodies anywhere! If someone touches you against your will, or after you   
   >retract permission, tell an authority figure so that person can be put   
   >in jail or get proper mental treatment."   
   >   
   >The real truth behind you not wanting to let children have the right to   
   >decide what is done with their own bodies is NOT because you are   
   >worried about them getting sexually transmitted diseases or any other   
   >reason that has been stated.   
      
      
   It's because of sick fucks like you.   
      
   >It is because you are worried that if people have the right to have   
   >sexual contact with children, they won't want YOU anymore! It is a   
   >simple case of jealousy, and wanting to have ONE thing that children   
   >cannot have.   
      
   The alcohol is getting to you crissy.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)