XPost: alt.support.boy-lovers, alt.fan.prettyboy, alt.oyp.norp   
   XPost: alt.support.girl-lovers   
   From: mccoyf@millcomm.com   
      
   In alt.support.girl-lovers "bobandcarole" wrote:   
      
   >He said he is sending to Congress a legislative package that includes   
   >greater penalties and improved cooperation from Internet service   
   >providers.   
   >   
   >"This legislation will help ensure that Internet service providers   
   >report the presence of child pornography on their systems by   
   >strengthening criminal penalties for failing to report it," the   
   >attorney general said.   
      
   Anybody want to bet that it won't be just another flimsy re-write of the CPA   
   (Grossly misnamed the "Child Protection Act") which was yet another rewrite of   
   Comstock's original legislation against anything sexual; including especially   
   information on birth-control, to prevent women from not having kids?   
      
   The Supreme Court keeps ruling that adults have the right to sexual information   
   and striking down those laws; and Congress keeps right on trying to pass the   
   same old shit ... Always (of course) disguised as "Protecting Children from the   
   HORRORS of Pornography"; when in actuality they're more aimed at preventing   
   ANYBODY from getting sexual information of any kind ... particularly about   
   birth-control.   
      
   Politicians are well familiar with giving truly obnoxious legislation names   
   that   
   make it seem downright unpatriotic and almost criminal to oppose ... like the   
   so-called "PATRIOT" act, which is prima-facie unconstitutional, and the   
   so-called "Child Protection Act" which would have truly *hurt* far more   
   children   
   than it ever would have protected from the evils of pornography. If nothing   
   else, than by preventing their parents access to birth-control information.   
      
   I presume this particular re-write will only change a word or two from the   
   earlier attempts to revive Comstock's legacy, present the legislation as "new";   
   and hope that with our new SCOTUS that this time they'll get it through the   
   courts.   
      
   Anybody taking my bets?   
      
   --   
    _____   
    / ' / ™   
    ,-/-, __ __. ____ /_   
    (_/ / (_(_/|_/ / <_/ <_   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|