XPost: alt.support.boy-lovers, alt.fan.frank.mccoy, alt.fan.prettyboy
XPost: alt.oyp.norp
From: mccoyf@millcomm.com
In alt.fan.frank.mccoy "bobandcarole" wrote:
>
>Frank McCoy wrote:
>> In alt.fan.frank.mccoy "bobandcarole" wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >Frank McCoy wrote:
>> >> In alt.fan.frank.mccoy "bobandcarole"
wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >Frank McCoy wrote:
>> >> >> In alt.fan.frank.mccoy "bobandcarole"
wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >Frank McCoy wrote:
>> >> >> >> In alt.fan.frank.mccoy "bobandcarole"
wrote:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >Transcript NBC DATELINE Expose on Jehovah Witnesses Pedophile
Cover-Up
>> >> >> >> >SHOW: Dateline
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >DATE: May 28, 2002
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> Yep ... Saw that show on TV.
>> >> >> >> The Religious Leaders of that group aren't exactly the Godly
people they pretend
>> >> >> >> to be, are they? But then: Those who protest most often that
they are the
>> >> >> >> annointed of God, rarely indeed are truly righteous people.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> The truly good people do their work, and ask for no rewards other
than the joy
>> >> >> >> of doing it.
>> >> >> >]
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >Who asked YOU frankie..
>> >> >> >You're worse then the JW's
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I, at least, am not a hypocrite; and don't condone what they do.
>> >> >
>> >> >No, you're a pedophile....
>> >>
>> >> If "pedophile" = "Someone who thinks underaged girls are sexy."
>> >> And "underaged" includes teenagers, then I guess I am.
>> >> Teenaged girls, as I've pointed out before, *ARE* sexy; often VERY sexy.
>> >> If you mean somebody who has sex with kids, then no.
>> >
>> >
>> >Since you seem to think there is nothing wrong with your lust for young
>> >girls I would suggest emailing FBI.gov and tell them how "wrong" they
>> >are.........
>>
>> There's nothing illegal about lusting after anybody.
>> What's illegal is what you *do*, not what you think.
>> So far, anyway. Bush & Co. are doing their best to make thinking
>> non-government-approved thoughts illegal.
>>
>> And I'm sure the FBI knows all about me; as do Customs and the Post Office,
as
>> well as the local police. Hell, I even showed the local police the stories
I
>> write, and they agreed that *writing* stories like that isn't illegal.
>
>Somebody turned old frankie in?
>
>BWAAAAHAHAHAHA
>
Correction:
Somebody *tried* to.
The cops agreed that what I was doing was *quite* legal.
What I have around the house isn't even really considered "porn", let alone CP.
> Somebody
>> mistakenly thought they were "child porn".
>>
>> So, I *voluntarily* showed them around my house, showed them the stories I
>> wrote, and showed them the computer. Nothing illegal anywhere. Like people
>> here, I told them that because I *was* willing to stand up in court and
defend
>> my right to write and post *stories*, I didn't even have legal *adult* porn
on
>> the computer; that way there wouldn't be any distractions if somebody got
>> overzealous and tried to prosecute me. They agreed that was the way to do
>> things.
>>
>
>So you go to all that trouble and embarrassment just to write perverted
>stories???
To support the First Amendment, among other things.
My stories also have other points I try to make.
They're *not* just sex-stories, as I've pointed out many times before.
>I knew you were insane
Well, it's no surprise to me either than you don't support the 1st Amendment.
You've already made it *quite* clear many times that you support the idea of
thought-control. If somebody thinks things or has ideas you don't like, you
want them imprisoned or even killed.
I suspect you'd want anybody who's read "The Communist Manifesto" incarcerated
as a Communist. That's about your style and way of thinking.
--
_____
/ ' / ™
,-/-, __ __. ____ /_
(_/ / (_(_/|_/ / <_/ <_
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
