XPost: alt.sex.stories.incest, alt.stories.incest, alt.sex.incest   
   From: mccoyf@millcomm.com   
      
                            Being Sensible   
                       (Or, "Statutory Rape" #2)   
                            An Erotic Story   
      
        Some people can convince themselves of anything:  That black   
   is white, that bad is good, that children are better left   
   ignorant, that listening to a preacher quote parts of the Bible   
   is better than reading the Bible for yourself, that neglecting a   
   child sexually is better for the child than helping the child   
   grow up properly, that ignorance really is bliss, and that sex is   
   evil ... an invention of the Devil.   
        Since when did the Devil invent *anything* ... especially   
   anything *good*?  Sex is *good*, not evil, no matter what the   
   preachers say.  Nowhere in the Bible, Koran, or any other   
   religious tract they quote, is any mention of sex being other   
   than a wonderful invention of God ... Yet most preachers seem to   
   spout off like sex was the Original Sin that damns us all.   
   Nowhere in the Books they rant about is any such claim or even   
   suggestion.  Heck, sex is needed for procreation!   
        Even "sex with children" and today's "Crime of the Decade:   
   Child-Pornography" isn't a sin.  Hell, in the Bible most girls   
   were married and having kids of their own at twelve, eleven, or   
   even ten years old, if you read the tracts yourself.  Not once is   
   it mentioned in the Bible that a girl of *any* age is too young   
   for sex ... Solomon having many wives and concubines as young as   
   eight, I believe ... Yet *he* was considered one of the wisest   
   men in the whole world.  There were, I guess, constraints against   
   men "despoiling a virgin"; but even those weren't directed   
   against parents or prospective husbands.   
        Oh, there *are* some silly verses about how a man shouldn't   
   see his own daughters naked, or something like that ... along   
   with similar silliness about how he shouldn't lie down next to   
   his wife when she's having her period.  This from the book where   
   Adam marries his own clone ... about as close an incest as you   
   can get.  (What *else* would you call a woman made from the same   
   DNA, from Adam's bone, than his clone; as she's definitely *not*   
   his identical twin?)  Add to that, the fact that, as the Bible   
   Tells It, the only people their kids had to marry, besides   
   siblings, were their own father and mother.  Go ahead and tell me   
   they didn't have incest together, without any idiot preachers   
   around to give them horse-manure about it being evil.  This   
   doesn't even mention Noah, where the same thing started all over   
   again ... again, without some sanctimonious idiot saying it's   
   wrong to have sex with your parents or children.  A man shouldn't   
   gaze upon his own daughter's nakedness?  Shit.  A man unwilling   
   to see his daughter naked shouldn't *have* children in the first   
   place; as a man should be fully prepared to change a daughter's   
   diaper, just like his son's.  Once the little girl gets to be   
   five or six years old, and big enough to take at least the tip of   
   her father's penis inside her body, then, if the man needs to use   
   her tight little slit to jack-off into, or her flat little tummy   
   as a convenient receptacle to dump sperm in, then why the hell   
   not?  After all, he *is* her own father, not some stranger who   
   might abuse her sexually.   
        If, at eight, seven, six, or even five years old, a little   
   girl wakes up in the night and finds her father pushing his   
   engorged penis into her body, then shouldn't the child push back;   
   helping the man work his swollen member as deep into her body as   
   they can, so her father can get the relief he needs by dumping   
   his cum in a little girl's womb where it belongs?  Just like it's   
   a man's duty to see to his daughter's well-being and sex-   
   education, it's a daughter's duty to take care of her father,   
   even or especially if that means letting her father use his   
   little girl's tight little cunny-hole and developing body as a   
   sperm-dump to relieve himself in.   
        The wonderful thing for the father, of course, is that if   
   he's fucking his own kids then he doesn't have to worry about   
   using a condom; as it's obvious that his own daughters don't have   
   STDs or AIDS; and as long as he keeps *his* prick only tucked up   
   inside family vaginas like he's supposed to, then he won't get   
   them either to pass on to the girls.  There's something extra-   
   special to a man about feeling a young girl's tight little cunny   
   squeezing on his bare prick while ejaculating thick heavy gobs of   
   baby-making seed into her completely unprotected fertility, like   
   a man is supposed-to.  That's why it's so nice to fuck your own   
   daughters; as only by dumping your wad in your own kid is it safe   
   enough that a man doesn't have to worry about condoms, STDs, or   
   getting the girl pregnant.  After all, who's going to object if   
   you knob your own kid?  The girl?  Be sensible.  That's something   
   more men should think about before fucking just any young girl,   
   instead of his own daughters like he's supposed to.   
        Yes, "supposed to".  A man is supposed to teach his little   
   girls about sex; and how better for the girls to learn than have   
   their own father personally demonstrate exactly what sex is, how   
   it's done, and where babies actually come from, with his prick   
   and their nubile young bodies?  There's no better lesson than   
   feeling your own father climb on top of you, spread your legs,   
   his sperm-bloated and cum-leaking prick poking into your tight   
   little crack, sliding into your body, swelling inside your tight   
   little baby-hole, then bulging and spitting thick gooey wads and   
   sticky white gobs of your own father's virile, sperm-filled, and   
   baby-making cream deep inside your developing fertility while one   
   of your parents describes exactly how the sticky white cum your   
   father is depositing deep inside your body contains the sperm   
   that gets little girls like you pregnant ... if you're lucky.   
        Of course, once a man *has* shown his daughter how little   
   girls get knocked-up, and how good it feels to have sex with a   
   man, then it wouldn't be fair to her or even to him to have her   
   father stop making love to the youngster once the original sex-   
   education-class demonstration of feeling her father's thick prick   
   sliding in and out of her tight little slit, swelling inside her,   
   and then the ultimate "sexual demonstration" of having her own   
   father dumping thick sticky wads of his potent, virile, and sperm-   
   filled baby-goo as far as he can up inside his own nubile young   
   daughter's sexy young tummy and developing fertility is complete.   
   Besides, like I said, it feels *good* for a man to dump his cum   
   in the belly of a sexy little girl while her tight little baby-   
   hole squeezes and milks his bare quivering prick for the thick   
   sticky wads and gooey white blobs of baby-cream they both now   
   know the girl's father has inside him, just needing to be   
   ejaculated in the fertile young tummy of a young girl where it   
   belongs.  And yes, it feels good to the little girl too; so why   
   *shouldn't* a child take care of her father's sexual needs like   
   that; especially if the girl's father is taking care of *her*   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)