XPost: alt.politics.british, alt.politics.bush, alt.politics.democrats   
   XPost: alt.politics.republicans, can.legal, misc.legal   
   XPost: rec.arts.disney.parks, talk.politics.misc, uk.media   
   From: forget@it.com   
      
   Jon C wrote:   
   > I don't blame Disney at all.  Michael Moore is such a propoganda artist it's   
   > obscene.  He's clearly demonstrated he won't hesitate to greatly skew the   
   > truth and even lie to make a point.   
      
      And Drugs Limburger isn't?  Sean "Dough-Boy" Hannity?   
      
   > There are so many great arguments against Bush and company, it amazes me   
   > that this guy needs to make shit up and mislead people over and over to get   
   > his point across.   
      
      Moore sees the world through his lens, but that is no different than   
   the drivel troweled out by Roger Ailes and FAUX News.  If anything, MM   
   is far more "fair and balanced."   
      
   > I don't blame Disney at all.  I think this has less to do with upsetting   
   > Bush than it does not wanting to produce and distribute a film that is   
   > slanderous and grossly misleading.  That's smart business, IMO.   
      
      When they fire Hannity at WABC, they can talk that talk.  Beyond   
   that, they should honor their commitment (as evidenced by the ~$6M they   
   threw at the movie) to distribute it, on time and as originally   
   contemplated.  Moore's movie, regardless of what you think of the guy,   
   has a shelf life and needs to be distributed now.   
      
      Basic contract law.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)