XPost: alt.politics.british, alt.politics.bush, alt.politics.democrats
XPost: alt.politics.republicans, can.legal, misc.legal
From: vox@popu.li
Ken Smith wrote:
> Gerard Greeley wrote:
>> Ken Smith wrote in message
>> news:<40A626E3.10106@it.com>...
>>> Gerard Greeley wrote:
>>>> Ken Smith wrote in message
>>>> news:<40A1CA77.2040104@it.com>...
>>>>> Jon C wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't blame Disney at all. Michael Moore is such a propoganda
>>>>>> artist it's obscene. He's clearly demonstrated he won't
>>>>>> hesitate to greatly skew the truth and even lie to make a point.
>>>>>
>>>>> And Drugs Limburger isn't? Sean "Dough-Boy" Hannity?
>>>>>
>>>>>> There are so many great arguments against Bush and company, it
>>>>>> amazes me that this guy needs to make shit up and mislead people
>>>>>> over and over to get his point across.
>>>>>
>>>>> Moore sees the world through his lens, but that is no different
>>>>> than
>>>>> the drivel troweled out by Roger Ailes and FAUX News. If
>>>>> anything, MM
>>>>> is far more "fair and balanced."
>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't blame Disney at all. I think this has less to do with
>>>>>> upsetting Bush than it does not wanting to produce and
>>>>>> distribute a film that is slanderous and grossly misleading.
>>>>>> That's smart business, IMO.
>>>>>
>>>>> When they fire Hannity at WABC, they can talk that talk.
>>>>
>>>> I am no fan of Sean Hannity or Michael Moore. Although you spent a
>>>> lot of time on attacking Rush Limbaugh, Hannity, Fox News,
>>>> President
>>>> Bush, etc. in your posts, I don't think there is much content in
>>>> your
>>>> words.
>>>
>>> I find it quite revealing that, when I do a Google search for
>>> "Gerard Greeley," I could find one and only one USENET post. A
>>> designer troll,
>>> firing off an unfair attack -- WHAT A SURPRISE!!!
>>>
>>> [Ken rolls eyes]
>>>
>>> Let us just say that a lie is a terrible way to introduce
>>> yourself.
>>
>> You are quite internet the detective.
>
> A-HA! Yoda your former handle was! :)
>
>> If it's any of your business
>> Sherlock, I got tired of spam clogging my mailbox from these
>> discussion forums, and I'm hoping this filter won't fail me.
>
> Likely story! You JUST HAPPENED to come to that conclusion, and
> you
> JUST HAPPENED to take corrective action and then, JUST HAPPENED to
> fire
> an arrow at me, straight out of the blue, right? Now, why *shouldn't*
> that sound like COMPLETE bullshit?
>
> That you chose me is a bit of a stretch, considering that Uncle
> Samuel and Vox Populi are flooding this NG with "eat shit and die"
> exchanges.
Sammy started it.
And besides, he does eat shit ... he just won't die.
> That you would go after me, but not Ted Kaldis, is
> presumptive evidence that you have an agenda, which you are not candid
> enough to reveal here. And that you should fire at me at this time,
> when the bulk of my posts involve advanced discussion of our structure
> of government....
>
> Let us just say on its face, that your story is less than
> compelling.
>
> But be that as it may; you can start by revealing your former
> handle,
> so we can all get a fair notion of what your political position
> *really*
> is.
>
>> I tried to email you but it seems to keep bouncing back to me as
>> undeliverable.
>
> Absolutely. I got tired of people telling me all the amazing
> things
> little Patty can do with farm animals.
>
>> What's that about a "designer troll"?
>
> That you would take your first shot out of the box at me suggests
> that you have a beef with me -- that *is* the modus operandi of the
> "designer troll."
>
>> How about addressing my post per relevance? If you can.
>
> Sure. Let's start with you expressing your opinion about Ted
> Kaldis' constant references to my bar admission dispute. Do you or
> do you not
> agree that *they* are ad hominem attacks? If not, why not? And if
> so,
> why did you attack me and not him?
>
> I'll be happy to talk substance about any issue you want to bring
> up,
> but until you can prove to me that you are on the level, I am entitled
> to presume that you are not. Just the way USENET is.
--
"The most important thing is for us to find Osama bin Laden. It is our
number one priority and we will not rest until we find him."
~ George Bush Jr. 2001-09-13
"I don't know where he (bin Laden) is. I have no idea and I really
don't care. It's not that important. It's not our priority."
~ George Bush Jr. 2002-03-13
"I was not prepared to shoot my eardrum out with a shotgun in order to
get a deferment. Not was I willing to go to Canada. So I chose to
better myself by learning how to fly airplanes."
~George W. Bush on how he dodged the
Vietnam draft---1994
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
