XPost: alt.philosophy.taoism, alt.buddha.short.fat.guy, alt.supp   
   rt.schizophrenia   
   From: being@apolka.sign   
      
   Noah wrote:   
   >aye wrote:   
   >>Noah wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>Unclear sentence.   
   >>   
   >>Generalizations tend to generalize.   
   >>   
   >>>>The rest of us don't believe that psychiatrists don't act without good   
   >>>>reason.   
   >>>   
   >>>Better would be   
   >>>The rest of us don't believe that psychiatrists act without good   
   >>>reason.   
   >>   
   >>Better would be, some of you, ... ...   
   >>You being the plural of you.   
   >>   
   >>As for the rest of us ... ...   
   >>Us being, Taoists who see how good and bad argh.   
   >>   
   >>- aye   
   >   
   >The contrast being between him who thinks badly of psychiatrists and   
   >the rest of us who don't believe that, true or not.   
      
   Us and them tend to end where two begin.   
      
   Not all head-shrinkers are all bad nor all good.   
   Their Ways, which are, Ways, are not always the Way, eh.   
      
   Each so-called, individual, may have his or her own Tao.   
   For a society, a culture, to say what is true, reality, actual,   
   phenomenal and counts could be in error, given: time beings.   
      
   > But you are right   
   >it is a generalization.  There might be others who think badly of   
   >psychiatrists.  But for keeping yourself free of being thought a   
   >nutcase, my suggesting seems serviceable, if not accepted by the   
   >recipient.   
      
   Aye. To pose as a threat is ill-advised.   
   Complexes vary. Some folks are obsessed.   
   Some are compelled. Degrees vary.   
      
   - cheers!   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)