XPost: alt.philosophy.taoism, alt.buddha.short.fat.guy, alt.supp   
   rt.schizophrenia   
   From: being@apolka.sign   
      
   Noah wrote:   
   >one wrote:   
   >>Noah wrote:   
   >>>aye wrote:   
   >>>>Noah wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>Unclear sentence.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>Generalizations tend to generalize.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>>The rest of us don't believe that psychiatrists don't act without good   
   >>>>>>reason.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>Better would be   
   >>>>>The rest of us don't believe that psychiatrists act without good   
   >>>>>reason.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>Better would be, some of you, ... ...   
   >>>>You being the plural of you.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>As for the rest of us ... ...   
   >>>>Us being, Taoists who see how good and bad argh.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>- aye   
   >>>   
   >>>The contrast being between him who thinks badly of psychiatrists and   
   >>>the rest of us who don't believe that, true or not.   
   >>   
   >>Us and them tend to end where two begin.   
   >>   
   >>Not all head-shrinkers are all bad nor all good.   
   >>Their Ways, which are, Ways, are not always the Way, eh.   
   >   
   >And when dealing with somebody who says they are all bad, it does not   
   >help to remind them that some are better than others.  But it might be   
   >useful to say that they as a group don't tend to act without good   
   >reason.  Like profs, though, they are human and will have human   
   >faults.  And sometimes have reasons that lesser folk don't understand.   
      
   Lesser folk? Really?   
      
   >>Each so-called, individual, may have his or her own Tao.   
   >>For a society, a culture, to say what is true, reality, actual,   
   >>phenomenal and counts could be in error, given: time beings.   
   >>   
   >>> But you are right   
   >>>it is a generalization.  There might be others who think badly of   
   >>>psychiatrists.  But for keeping yourself free of being thought a   
   >>>nutcase, my suggesting seems serviceable, if not accepted by the   
   >>>recipient.   
   >>   
   >>Aye. To pose as a threat is ill-advised.   
   >>Complexes vary. Some folks are obsessed.   
   >>Some are compelled. Degrees vary.   
   >   
   >RG is not simply obsessed/complexed/compelled.  He has outed himself   
   >as being capable of rationality.  I say, take that and run with it.   
      
   Being naive, trusting an authority figure who   
   asks one to be honest may prove to be unwise.   
      
   Could be experience has proven to RG a thing or three.   
      
   >>- cheers!   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)