XPost: alt.philosophy.taoism, alt.buddha.short.fat.guy, alt.supp
rt.schizophrenia
From: fedora@fea.st
On Thu, 22 Jul 2021 17:38:15 -0700, aye wrote:
>Noah wrote:
>>one wrote:
>>>Noah wrote:
>>>>one wrote:
>>>>>Noah wrote:
>>>>>>aye wrote:
>>>>>>>Noah wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Unclear sentence.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Generalizations tend to generalize.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>The rest of us don't believe that psychiatrists don't act without good
>>>>>>>>>reason.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Better would be
>>>>>>>>The rest of us don't believe that psychiatrists act without good
>>>>>>>>reason.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Better would be, some of you, ... ...
>>>>>>>You being the plural of you.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>As for the rest of us ... ...
>>>>>>>Us being, Taoists who see how good and bad argh.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>- aye
>>>>>>
>>>>>>The contrast being between him who thinks badly of psychiatrists and
>>>>>>the rest of us who don't believe that, true or not.
>>>>>
>>>>>Us and them tend to end where two begin.
>>>>>
>>>>>Not all head-shrinkers are all bad nor all good.
>>>>>Their Ways, which are, Ways, are not always the Way, eh.
>>>>
>>>>And when dealing with somebody who says they are all bad, it does not
>>>>help to remind them that some are better than others. But it might be
>>>>useful to say that they as a group don't tend to act without good
>>>>reason. Like profs, though, they are human and will have human
>>>>faults. And sometimes have reasons that lesser folk don't understand.
>>>
>>>Lesser folk? Really?
>>
>>Looking for a word. Non-phd?
>
>Degrees vary.
>What letters after a name, what a certificate names, names.
>
>Does a professor with a doctorate have a Tao, the Tao.
>Can he or she navigate beyond his or her playing field.
>
>Some head-shrinkers might stink of Zen.
>
>Others may scoff at a thought of being able to bend
>a spoon when there is no spoon given atomic physics.
>
>Tao Chia, assuming that's a topic, has some lines, verses,
>versus ways and names, beginning and going as it goes.
Still looking for a word. Non-professional?
>>>>>Each so-called, individual, may have his or her own Tao.
>>>>>For a society, a culture, to say what is true, reality, actual,
>>>>>phenomenal and counts could be in error, given: time beings.
>>>>>
>>>>>> But you are right
>>>>>>it is a generalization. There might be others who think badly of
>>>>>>psychiatrists. But for keeping yourself free of being thought a
>>>>>>nutcase, my suggesting seems serviceable, if not accepted by the
>>>>>>recipient.
>>>>>
>>>>>Aye. To pose as a threat is ill-advised.
>>>>>Complexes vary. Some folks are obsessed.
>>>>>Some are compelled. Degrees vary.
>>>>
>>>>RG is not simply obsessed/complexed/compelled. He has outed himself
>>>>as being capable of rationality. I say, take that and run with it.
>>>
>>>Being naive, trusting an authority figure who
>>>asks one to be honest may prove to be unwise.
>>
>>Certain people are in positions of public trust, policemen, doctors,
>>lawyers, psychiatrists. It is not that they ask for trust. It is
>>that we trust them with our lives, our fortunes, our brains because
>>there is no better choice.
>
>You and yours may.
>
>As for the rest of us, authorities have our earned distrust.
See my nearby post about lawyers.
>Some trust their deity or deities. Some trust their own selves
>as if they had or were selves, naturally, individually.
>
>>>Could be experience has proven to RG a thing or three.
>
>What does the G stand for?
RainbowGuardian. He used to call himself that. He still uses that in
his email address.
>- aye
>
>>>>>- cheers!
--
Noah Sombrero
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
