XPost: alt.philosophy.taoism, alt.buddha.short.fat.guy, alt.supp   
   rt.schizophrenia   
   From: being@apolka.sign   
      
   Noah wrote:   
      
   >  It is not our concern in any case.   
      
   To be unconcerned is best, imo.   
   Uninvolved. Without a care is ideal.   
      
   To be concerned if an objective world exists,   
   independent of any and all observers can be   
   used by scientists given a method, it works.   
      
   Hypothetically, no scientist exists.   
   That would be their premise, axiomatically.   
      
   To be concerned about psychologiical states,   
   how really real they are for many, one could be.   
      
   What concerns me the most, on most mornings   
   is when beer o'clock is, after a constitutional.   
      
   Dawns dawn, pattern wise.   
      
   - thanks again! Cheers!   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)